Search results

One other option the judge may pursue if she doesn't want to impose a gag order is moving up the trial. I just think she is going to be forced to find a way to constrain him. Or at least attempt to. JMO

I'll admit I laughed at this. All it took is her being arrested and standing trial as his co-defendant for her to 'see the light'. She's been very vocal in her criticism of Trump not paying her legal bills too so I'll admit I wonder if he was footing the bill for her defense, if she'd feel the...

Jack Smith is right - in Trump, you truly do have a unique threat. You have a person whom, as a former president and presidential candidate, is being treated as legitimate by the media which incalculably platforms his statements and expands his reach to witnesses and potential jurors alike. But...

RBBM To be fair, we don't know how the data was aggregated, if at all. But I see a lot of problems with prosecutors having to piecemeal discovery. You have multiple attorneys per defendant; the defense attorneys are usually making much more money than in the public sector; and at any given time...

I think this is beyond reasonable and fair - but I seriously question whether Trump would have the discipline to follow it. From the motion: I kinda wish Trump would just be remanded into pretrial custody. I think his actions warrant it. JMO

A panel of legal experts and political pundits were on msnbc sometime last week and they made a rather salient point. Look at what Trump was willing to do to remain in power... Now imagine what he'd be willing to do to guarantee his freedom. JMO

RBBM I have that problem a lot - a general comment about Trump and no clue which thread to put it in. :) ---------------- Jeffrey Clark filed his motion for removal. (I miss the devil emoji at moments like this.) The President of the United States is King, ya'll. And Jeffrey Clark says his case...

Just a video of the above quote. (Note the 'at least in my opinion' at the end. It's a wonder honestly anyone is willing to rep him.)

Starting at 16:57, there's overview and subsequent legal analysis over what happened in court yesterday for folks who are interested: By the way, Rafferty is Powell's lawyer - he's the "But in FEDERAL COURT..." guy. Grubman is Chesebro's attorney whom I very often want to smack. :) I find...

Judge has ruled against granting Shafer a hearing over his frivolous motion regarding being sent an advertising pamphlet by the Special Prosecutor's private practice...which I'll concede was a stupid mistake but seriously, why not just throw it away? Is it really worth the billables? JMO

Lol! The inimitable Mr. Will Wooten? I wasn't that lucky today but it makes me willing to watch more hearings in hope. :) ETA: Update to add. There will be NO oral argument in CA11 tomorrow. Meadows appeal is still moving ahead but he's removed his request to stay the State's proceedings (it...

Wade (State prosecutor) insists the information Rafferty is wanting is on the 8tb drive already given to defense ahead of schedule. Judge says we're spinning our wheels. Judge says lawyer should move for what he wants with substantive case law. Rafferty 'educated' Wade that as a 'former federal...

Rafferty up to complain about Brady violations (he's Powell's attorney). Ample evidence Powell wasn't behind Coffee County and that it (the breach) was authorized. There's a letter to prove it. Complaining he wants just those documents not 8tb of discovery. 'If this were in federal court,'...

State gives both state and federal case law to bolster their argument but the judge isn't buying it. State is trying to paint it as a fishing expedition but Judge points to a case that an indictment was tossed out because other people were in the deliberation room and how is a defendant to ever...

Defense Attorney doesn't believe the Grand Jury was indeed independent. (Yikes. It's the arrogant, bloviating who I hate listening to.) Complaining about not getting discovery soon enough and why shouldn't he have all the same information as the State? He won't ask about their deliberations as...

Motion for Special Grand Jury transcripts is taken under advisement but will likely be granted *in part* - testimony of witnesses the State plans to call. A defense attorney is whining that the State isn't filing a response in writing. The State points out they did file a response but it hasn't...

State willingly provides list of unindicted co-conspirators with the understanding neither side will disseminate their indentities. Oral argument by defense for full Special Grand Jury transcripts (attorneys getting Grand Jury *testimony* isn't all that unusual but unusually they're asking for...

BBM Yep. Just that basically - to discuss the case against the defendant(s) and whether there's a potential resolution to avoid going to trial. I don't have a PACER account, Niner and to my knowledge that's where federal dockets exist. Sorry. :( I don't see a hearing October 10th but motion...

Meadows and Clark are the only defendants that meet federal officer requirements. (Trump's arguable since he was elected and the fake electors, not even the ghost of a chance). Of all the removal motions, Meadows had the best chance. And well, we see how that's going. Meadows problem is though...

Reminder: Hearing tomorrow, September 14, 10am EST (15:00BST; 17:00 Niner; 00:00 AEST) Motions Hearing (Powell and Cheesebro). Will be livestreamed. Link: Judge McAfee's Court Oral argument for Meadows appeal in CA11 is scheduled (sds just beat my typing skills :)) but I'll add it's at 10:15am...