IMO what these two cases have in common is that in order to find the defendant not guilty, you have to make a perp out of the victim. Apparently, if there are no other witnesses, that is not such a difficult thing to do. Very sad that the victim's family then has to be subjected to such...
Some people get out of their vehicle and end up dead. IMO you should call 911 and then stay in your vehicle. If the suspicious person circles your vehicle, you should drive off to a safer place. But like I've said before, "I'm such a girl." :blushing:
See, IMO the fact he says he wouldn't do anything differently is just incredulous. Really?! You are being charged with the murder of an unarmed 17 year-old, and you are good with that?!
Wow.
IMO You are correct. GZ was fearful right then. IMO he probably thought TM would put his hands up and do what he was told to do not freak out and start (according to which witness you believe) whining, running, arguing, sucker punching, and/or screaming bloody murder.
What's worse is he did it to try and cover up for just (virtually because he stopped himself ) calling the jury stupid. "We color coded it for ya in case . . ." and then he holds up a timeline that looks like a grade schooler made it. :facepalm:
I agree that RJ's behavior after the call disconnected and all the way up to this trial is suspect. IMO the guilt she said she felt was not brought on by simply "being the last person to talk" with TM. It seems more logical that her guilt was come from some greater knowledge of what...
Just because the gun isn't cocked doesn't mean it's unloaded. Carrying a pistol with a round in the chamber is the equivalent of sticking a revolver in your holster with a fully loaded cylinder and the hammer back. :twocents:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.