QNA
Former Member
butterfly1978 - I thought that MH reacted most the word "rape", too.. But I haven't seen anything that suggests that she didn't act alone. Am I missing something?
Historical statistics.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
butterfly1978 - I thought that MH reacted most the word "rape", too.. But I haven't seen anything that suggests that she didn't act alone. Am I missing something?
Historical statistics.
...
...Historical statistics can be wrong...
...but don't you think that the possibility of this being an outlier is possible unless proven otherwise?
Why should we assume anything that contradicts the available evidence?
I don't see a thread on this so I thought I'd start one...I am hopeful that the judge will let Sandra's remains lay untouched.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/18/BA59174D2G.DTL
Done, thank you, soul.Can someone provide the time/date/location of the hearing scheduled in this matter and perhaps post it to the Astrology thread on Sandra?
Thank you,
Soulscape
Can someone provide the time/date/location of the hearing scheduled in this matter and perhaps post it to the Astrology thread on Sandra?
Thank you,
Soulscape
Searching - do we really know that Behar has ignored available evidence? The problem is - if a defense is allowed A, B or C, they're not going to accept not getting A, B or C... whether it seems deserved or not. Denying them such seems to lead to an even less favorable outcome.
Believe me - I could not be any less sympathetic for the defense than I am. If shown a photo of my daughter, many people would say she was a twin or sister of Sandra. They look that much alike. I'm startled every time I see Sandra's picture in the news... I think it makes me harder on the state for that reason, maybe... I want this done right.
Law and legal procedures are convoluted - and often irrational. The only thing that really seems to matter is that both sides have equal footing on all terms.
I think the biggest mistake may be in proceeding with the burial so rapidly. That goes against everything I feel emotionally, as a parent or otherwise, but I'm puzzled that given the fact that the primary judge is not available, given that the defense was not formally assigned and given that the likelihood of the defense arguing on anything - I think the family was ill-advised because it would have been far less painful if this had been argued before the final placement rather than after.
It has gotten to the point where you can't simply tell the truth in court anymore. I heard a talking head mention that a "guilty" plea isn't advised for any defendant in any court until later. Fair?The right to a fair trial is the backbone of our legal system.
Three options.
He could withdraw the request.
I am going to throw my two cents in thi heavily debated topic. Agree or disagree I do not care.
The Cantu family wants justice done for Sandra right now. I firmly think they know that Sandra's sprit left the her body the last time to took her last breath.If a second autopsy will help to convict the prep or prepss I think Sandra body needs to be exhumed As all the body was is the shell that held Sandra's spirit inside.If this helps the DA or the defense more to bring to justice the person or people which I think this was a solo act to justice. Let the defense do the second one.What I think they will find is a Solo prep.
JDB although it is clear from our posts that we have different views on whether or not Sandra should have a second autopsy. I want you to know that the logical way you put your opinion, gives me some comfort when I think of Sandra's family and their pain right now. Thank you.
(my bolding)
This is the most plausible scenario.