OK...I am very confused here. One of the big things that helped me believe what I do about this case is the comments by sarx here:
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=152263&page=14
Post # 341
Thanks everyone. I'm here to answer questions and happy to do so!
I will re-post it again, please feel free to copy this post and re-post it as new people come in, cuz I feel like I've said it a lot today.
Again, take it or leave it. I am verified, it by no means makes me perfect, but I've got a lot of years of knowledge, and it's not just from a study I found (sorry, getting a little snarky)
Here goes...
The dogs that came in are highly trained, highly certified and highly reliable.
The dogs were not hitting on something leftover by a previous owner. Their hits were in direct connection with something that happened recently.
The dogs were not hitting on biological matter from a living person or creature (including but not limited to urine, feces, spit, menstrual bleeding, blood from a cut, breast milk, pig roast matter etc)
How many dogs were used? We don't know. Just because we only heard about 1 means just that, it's all we heard about.
I think that about covers it.
BBM
I guess now I don't know what to believe?