To add a little info since most will notice the NCMEC logo on the age progressed photo of Rose, yes we are very close to her being listed. Yea! There is just a little mix up with the NCIC number. As soon as NCMEC gets the correct number, Rose will finally be listed. A big thank you to Gerry Nance at NCMEC for getting this age progressed picture of Rose done.:clap:
http://www.missingkids.com/missingki...archLang=en_US
:clap: Rose is finally listed on the NCMEC site as missing/endangered. It has been almost 34 years since she disappeared and she is just now listed. Now we can start getting her listed at other sites too. You did good Isabella.
This is the group wedding picture from Synanon. I think that the 4th girl from the left on the next to last row looks very much like Rose. Of course it is a profile and not the best picture. I tried to enlarge it but it just got blurry.
Have we lost everyone who was following/working on the Rose Cole case? We finally get it in spotlight cases and get an age progressed picture of Rose and no comments? What is up with that? Christine and I were so excited, I thought everyone else would be too.
The new picture is great, and so is the fact Rose is now in the spot light. I can't talk for everyone, but I do know there are some of us who are at the point where unless some new info is shared and brought to the forum, we are at a dead end. As is with the Anna Waters case, the most vital information is kept under lock and key. It is very aggravating here and other 30+ year old cases when we are told "There are exciting new developments we can't share with the forum", ("but you can continue to research the dead ends as long as those dead ends don't include the word dead.") The only thing that accomplishes is a feeling of superiority of the person writing it, and disappointment from the person reading it. If you can't tell, don't even mention it. I have noticed on several cases when this is done, the case goes stagnant. Many of us lose interest. We need to be thrown a bone every once in a while.
I don't think the woman in the group wedding photo is Rose. The Synanon.org site had other pictures that appear to be from that same group wedding --one of them is of the woman in the floral dress that looks like Rose in profile, but from the front there doesn't seem to be the same resemblence --this woman is more full in the face.
This is I believe the last picture of Rose taken. I cropped her brothers out so you can see her face better