North_Idaho_Nony
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2022
- Messages
- 844
- Reaction score
- 7,554
She’s local & so am I.Is this based on a weather report?
I'm confused, are you local?
Moo
We remember with horrific clarity.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She’s local & so am I.Is this based on a weather report?
I'm confused, are you local?
Moo
He was probably completely confused when he saw no police activity near the house the next morning.9:00AM: KOHBERGER'S PHONE BEGINS TO MOVE
9:32AM: PHONE IS PICKED UP NEAR MOSCOW MURDER HOUSE
12:36PM: KOHBERGER DRIVES PAST KATE'S CUP OF JOE COFFEE STAND
12:46PM: KOHBERGER VISITS ALBERTSON'S GROCERY STORE
From cellphone data produced by prosecutors
I will have to find the source since it is from a screenshot I took awhile ago
Looking at stars or counting out of state license plates MOO his hobby and what he had long done is immaterial.The "perfect" juror for BK would be an older, grumpy, male who is distrustful of cell phones, technology, high school diploma, divorced, not a college graduate. Sort of a loner type, who could understand a person going out at night to look at stars.
<modsnip>
AT said Wawawai Park was one of the locations BK went and insinuated there were more. SY is the first witness she has named, but there may be more. She says she can prove where BK was. My expectation is that SY would have BK's metadata proving exact GPS coordinates.I think people - myself included - are misunderstanding the alibi.
His alibi is Wawawai park and that area.
"Cell phone data places Kohberger near Wawawai park in the early hours of Nov. 13, 2022, nearly 40 minutes from the scene of the homicides."
The REASON he was out there that night is because on a regular basis he
1.) Goes for drives
2.) Jogs
3.) Hikes
4.) Looks at moon and stars
5.) Sometimes takes pictures of the countryside which proves he does these things
His photos are from different occasions. There is none zero zilch mention of any photos from the night he needs to have an alibi.
View attachment 501601
Kohberger claims he was in nearby park in Washington at time of murders
Bryan Kohberger’s defense filed his response for demand of an alibi Wednesday, the final day of their deadline. According to court documents, cell phone data places Kohberger near Wawawai park in the early hours of Nov. 13, 2022, nearly 40 minutes from the scene of the homicides. The...www.uiargonaut.comMap of Wawawai Park - Pullman - Moscow
AGREE, @Boxer. Also, legally, driving by a house numerous times, is not stalking, so BT had to say that.Have to disgree on that.
MOO DNA at a location plus cell pings nearby or there make it more likely the obvious occurred.
2:47-4:48 is BK phone off time, so actually I should have said his Alibi needs to address 4:04am to 4:20am 11/13/22.I think his alibi also needs to account for the time he allegedly drove from Pullman to Moscow. AT says that is not his car.
Good to know that is the norm. Thanks.tbf & MOO, that’s his normal demeanor. I promise! At least based on the (many) times I’ve been in his court, going back to when he was our magistrate judge, and that demeanor has continued during his time as our district judge.
I can’t express an opinion on other courts, but that collegial atmosphere in our courts is the way it’s been in Latah County for over 30 years.
That’s not to say there are never fireworks — there are — but they get squashed pretty quickly, MOO.
And BK would remember where he was that night before as the news broke.She’s local & so am I.
We remember with horrific clarity.
2:47-4:48 is BK phone off time, so actually I should have said his Alibi needs to address 4:04am to 4:20am 11/13/22.
I wonder if the dense fog that night had something to do with that night being picked for the murders. Harder to see someone if they were creeping around outside, more difficult to see or identify a vehicle? MOOShe’s local & so am I.
We remember with horrific clarity.
Where it stopped pinging when he left Pullman till it was turned back on south of Moscow... so what time was the white Elantra first seen on video driving by the house?
the first time it was captured on video by the house was 3:29 am.Where it stopped pinging when he left Pullman till it was turned back on south of Moscow... so what time was the white Elantra first seen on video driving by the house?
First pass was at 3:29am.Where it stopped pinging when he left Pullman till it was turned back on south of Moscow... so what time was the white Elantra first seen on video driving by the house?
It seems the defense has more than just say so. AT wrote:And then AT added this concerning piece of information:Star gazing is just a red herring .... The Motion implies there are some photos to show BK is out in the countryside at night.
It is vague - unclear - of just what these photos actually show .
It's like this:
John Doe likes to take long walks late at night down country roads a mile outside of his neighbourhood. He likes to look for deer and walk for exercise. On a few occasions here and there he has taken photos of deer crossing the road.
So at 4:00am a murder happens on Friday the 13th of October and John gets arrested a month later.
In John's State the defendant must submit an alibi defense if the defense is planning on using an alibi defense at trial. This means the defense must turn over any alibi evidence such as security camera footage or phone videos or phone photos...etc... And also give prosecutors a list of witnesses if they have any.
There is a time limit...The prosecution needs time to investigate the alibi evidence and interview any witnesses. The prosecution also needs time to secure their own evidence and rebuttal witnesses etc....
So the defense says that John Doe's alibi is that he was out walking that night like he usually does. To prove it they have some phone photos and phone videos that John took of deer crossing the road on September 19th, September 30th, October 5th and wait, a photo back in August of the moon and stars.
So even though John has no phone proof from the night in question, nothing on his phone from Friday the 13th of October, the jury should still just believe his alibi because, well, he has been out walking other nights, right?
And if he was out walking on those other nights shouldn't the jury just logically conclude that of course John was out walking a mile from his home when the murder took place?
Just walking, watching deer cross the road, and even gazing at the moon and stars.
Now if you were a juror at John Doe's trial wouldn't you believe what Anne Taylor is telling you about John's alibi?
2 Cents... (A 2 Cent Headache)
Zetx methodology is apparently untested, relies on a formula not based in radio engineering principles and is controversial.It seems the defense has more than just say so. AT wrote:View attachment 501776And then AT added this concerning piece of information:
View attachment 501775
Page 2 of:
IMO, the prosecution should be concerned and actively looking into this allegation. AT cannot lie in a court document. This is NOT a bluff. She knows what BT SHOULD have. If he doesn't have it, BT needs to find out why not and if he does have it and is withholding it, either accidentally or on purpose, that's illegal. He should do everything in his power to turn it over to the defense quickly. With the completely disorganized discovery he's turned over to the defense, he could explain he didn't know he had it, I suppose. The Judge should then appoint a Discovery Special Master.
All JMO.
Looking at stars or counting out of state license plates MOO his hobby and what he had long done is immaterial.
AT seems to know how to use misdirection masterfully.
His whereabouts 11/13/22 2:47am to 4:48am is the question.
Thankfully, rarely is the guilt or innocence proven via the selection of the jury. Usually, it is the law and what evidence and rebuttal is given.
Now, when the facts and evidence are sketchy and not clear cut, THEN is when the jury pool can make a difference. Look at the OJ case. The DNA evidence went over their heads.
Zetx methodology is apparently untested, relies on a formula not based in radio engineering principles and is controversial.