What if, just WHAT IF, it turns out his phone was at the trails between 12 noon and 1:30 pm and then shows his phone at home? Would THAT be enough to convince those that presume him guilty to change their minds about who possibly committed this despicable crime OR would they just come up with another scenario to put him there during the time L & A where murdered?
Next they’ll be attacking Ferency (RIP), Murphy and Purdy. So predictable. I take one back. Fortunately, according to GF’s fellow officers, his record was impeccable and was rightfully honoured for his exemplary service at his funeral.
I'm confused, how would Todd Click's employment records discredit him?
No because we presume he did a set up before the crime. It would help if he didn't have the same frame as BG or at least what I perceive. Same short legs, little feet, & sloped shoulders. The rest is a blurry mystery. It would also help if he didn't implicate himself as being there and wearing the clothing.
In my case there’s some truth to what you suspect. When there’s a large pile of evidence, even if it’s all circumstantial, your mind resists knocking it down for a single given anomaly. The bullet evidence alone is almost perfectly damning. I know that some people don’t give it much weight, but the minute I read about it in the PCA I knew they have the guy this time. That thing isn’t there if he’s not there racking the slide of his Sig and he all but puts himself there. Then you realize that there’s all this other circumstantial evidence.
This is exactly how I feel. My hope is that everyone and anyone involved is accounted for. The girls were out walking, gets me so angry. Just thinking about what LE has released thus far, it stands out to me that the end goal was nude pictures. IMOI read it. It seems to me P dared the defense to share the confessions. It seems RA confessed to 30 different people at mininum at varying times and under multiple circumstances. The state asked the D to identified the specific statements of RA that were illegally coerced and identifying the state actor whose conduct supports the allegation of coercion and describe the conduct they believe to be physically or psychologically coercive before the State is required for further analysis by the Court.
Yes I know this his the official PCA. This document only shows military time in the narrative between RA and DD. The rest is in non military ( standard) time. My issue is the other poster screenshot an altered unverified document that does not match this PCA. I have asked her to link the whole document she screenshot and she has been unable to do so.
Okay, but on the flip side, the Defense will also be busy preparing to discredit the character of the State's witnesses. This is how a trial works unfortunately.
Absolutely. I just wanted to jump in because I know I mentioned it showing military time and can't remember if I posted a link and was hoping I didn't muddy this up. I think we would all benefit from the official documents we can use. I will spend some time in the media threads today. I like going back from the beginning as more comes out.
In the category of I-have-no-legitimate-reason-to-say-this, I’ve wondered if in chatting about the case KA has ever divulged that RA was there that day. It’s still hard for me to imagine she didn’t recognize BG if he is her husband, AND she knew he was there (?) but almost even more surprising if she had no suspicion yet never talked about it. I might have a big mouth and when the topic came up want to say that my husband was there and probably just missed seeing the girls and killer. Just normal conversation regarding knowledge about an abnormal and terrible thing that happened. You know, like telling people about how someone you know crossed the Minneapolis or Baltimore bridge 10 minutes before it collapsed. Maybe I overshare.
