RSBMThey can argue that RA is definitely one of the killers, so raising the possibility of an accomplice does not actually raise doubt.
Okay then! SHOW ME THE MONEY! What accomplices?? THEY haven’t pulled any out of their hats! Surely with ALL the evidence they have against RA they would have been able to link him to them, no?? If RA hasn’t rolled on them after everything he’s been through, I doubt he ever will! The reason he hasn’t rolled on any is because RA had NO accomplices because he didn’t kill the girls. MOO. In my estimation there’s no way he could do what was done by himself. Others will disagree and I’m fine with that.
As fact, we know EF, JM and RAbr are connected to BH and PW. Easy peasy. TH, JM’s ex testified to that and also that he borrowed her car and it came back with blood on it. They have JM’s phone. They know he kidnaps at gunpoint, even without ammo when he doesn’t get his meth. Yes, maybe EF’s phone was not at the crime scene that day. Maybe he was told to leave it at home? Oh right, that’s what RA did and that makes him a suspect, but not EF?
So, if all this can be known, why can’t they find the accomplices they suppose RA was connected to? Surely they have the means to do that.
All JMO
Ed:sp past my bedtime
Last edited: