And actually, how likely is it the jury will ever hear about the issues with the search warrant at all? Can JG just decide before the trial to forbid the Defense from bringing them up?
www.courttv.com
I do hope JG has read the Franks memorandum by now.
Just thought this needed to be posted again as I think it's VERY important in the scheme of things...or in the scheming of things AJMO
Click himself, back in Sept 2023, said nobody believes an Odinism sacrifice and the D was "twisting facts". And Click is to testify for the D?
"A retired Indiana police officer cited in court documents by defense attorneys for the man charged in the Delphi murders is calling into question how his statements have been characterized by attorneys, suggesting the defense is “twisting facts.”
(...)
"In a statement released to Court TV, retired Rushville, Indiana officer Todd Click writes: “No one in law enforcement believes Abby and Libby were killed in a ritual sacrifice. That is the defense twisting facts for sensationalism.” Click did not agree to an interview, citing the gag-order in effect on witnesses and investigators in the case."
Delphi investigators: Defense 'twisting facts for sensationalism' over cult sacrifice claims
Richard Allen's public defenders have accused a white nationalist Odinist group of killing the girls in a ritualistic sacrifice.
RSBM/BBM
She read and ruled.
I don't know, I don't know how US system work, I am a totally ignorant about that but from what I heard/read I think the probable cause and search warrant are legal because the remaining information - what RA said is enough for a probable cause.
Actually records were subpoenaed from Rushville PD because Click had Brady-Giolio violations on his record. That's something very serious and goes to the truthfulness and integrity of the person. Considering his conflicting statements about the suppised Odinist ritual killings of the girls, his statement about the D's behavior of "twisting facts" and his serious violations as a police officer, I'd say it's important all that came out before trial. It would not have been in the defendant's best interests to hook his defense to such an unreliable and untruthful source...in the context of RA getting competent representation with credible witnesses. AJMO
www.documentcloud.org
Actually records were subpoenaed from Rushville PD because Click had Brady-Giolio violations on his record. That's something very serious and goes to the truthfulness and integrity of the person. Considering his conflicting statements about the suppised Odinist ritual killings of the girls, his statement about the D's behavior of "twisting facts" and his serious violations as a police officer, I'd say it's important all that came out before trial. It would not have been in the defendant's best interests to hook his defense to such an unreliable and untruthful source...in the context of RA getting competent representation with credible witnesses. AJMO
DocumentCloud
Maybe because they weren't lies?
The link requesting them was provided
Not everything needs a hearing, MO
No idea but maybe because there isn't proof they are lies? We have to wait for the officers testimonies and the witnesses testimonies to see. It is possible the police just misinterpreted what the witness said, it is possible one witness said one thing in 2017 and other things in 2019 or vice-versa, etc.
Well as the public were not entitled to see them and rightly so. That's why the State subpoenaed them. If necessary they will come into the court record during pre-trial, I suppose. Otherwise I think they'd most likely stay sealed. JMO
