They are not facts. They are....information? Possible data points? They are things that cannot be proven to be true -- which is a fact.
For example, with the JC case, we had some facts, almost all of them were based on the transcript of the 911 call and a few direct statements from LE. (And even a couple of the LE data points were shown to be false at the end of the day.) These are things we absolutely knew to be true. Quite simply, even though there are things about this case in MSM, the basis of these things come from sources that we have strong reservations about at this time. Again, *may* they be true? Certainly. Can we say they are now? I don't think so, and I have a belief LE is of a similar mindset.
That there isn't a 911 call to turn to on this case to help develop a timeline and other pertinent information is a significant problem. A lack of corroborated eyewitness is another huge problem. If we get a report tomorrow that a bartender or another guest saw PH in the bar, then we have a fact. Or LE saying they saw her on a security recording -- then we have a fact.
We just have a few details about this case and precious few facts which leads to speculation and frustration. I have nothing invested in this case or any ideas that I have about what may have happened because it's just conjecture. I'm willing to wait and see what happens, but it certainly doesn't reduce my interest in the case.