Lava
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2010
- Messages
- 2,030
- Reaction score
- 315
Touche. Last week it was all but impossible to post theories about family involvement (including creepy cousin) without a counter-post that attempted to nullify it.
IMO some folks here bring preconceived notions about a family's involvement and nothing - no new info, no new insight - will change that short of an arrest. But why the need to counter-post and state their position over and over?
Also, I don't say this because I have an anti-family agenda. I thought originally that dad might have been hiding something based on his first appearance, but after the last two appearances I believe he and his wife had nothing to do with anything. Cousin is a different story.
I run several different theories in my head at the same time. Some involve family, some involve strangers. When you have so little information, that is all you can do. But it is only fair to look at all the options. The things that I say "stick out" to me, or seem weird, or noticeably, or whatever I say don't necessarily point to guilty or not guilty. They are just noticeable things. For instance, saying we don't hear from her friends and the family doesn't mention any - doesn't mean they are guilty or not. I'm not suggesting that they lock her in her room for 24 hours and are terrible parents, lol. It is just something that gives a little more insight into their family life - not a bad thing.
But I think it is unfair to suggest that some people will criticize the family no matter what just because someone has something to say after the family speaks, because it does suggest an anti-family attitude, which isn't the case at all. These are just theories, what ifs. And for every one of mine that involves the family, there is one that doesn't. :moo: