Bankrupt Casey Anthony interviewed by KPHO CBS in Phoenix #2

New Posts

Steely Dan said:
I just heard about this. I'm disgusted, but she is already morally bankrupt.
Click to expand...
Well put. Why these attorneys would want to have their "good" names associated with the likes of her is beyond me. Are they not aware of the "foolproof suffocation" searches? Do they not realize she got away with murder (or are they as dense as the Pinellas 12)? Why align themselves with a person who, at the very least (sorry Caylee :(), neglected a two-year old child?
 
RR0004 said:
Well put. Why these attorneys would want to have their "good" names associated with the likes of her is beyond me. Are they not aware of the "foolproof suffocation" searches? Do they not realize she got away with murder? Why align themselves with a person who, at the very least (sorry Caylee :(), neglected a two-year old child?
Click to expand...

A big chunk of the forgiven money was due for JB. He won't see it now. :floorlaugh:
 
NEXT ZENAIDA and KRONK HEARING
January 14, 2013 at 11:00am in Tampa

- Kronk Complaint against Casey Anthony
- Kronk Determine Whether Proceeding Core

- Zenaida Complaint against Casey Anthony – dischargeability
- Zenaida Determine Non-Core Elements of Complaint


ZENAIDA
Casey Anthony’s Motion to Dismiss Zenaida Complaint was DENIED on Nov 5, 2013. Casey Anthony has 21 days to ANSWER [Nov 26, 2013].

Casey Anthony’s Motions to stop Zenaida from taking a deposition from Casey Anthony was DENIED, and Casey’s attorneys were sanctioned $ 500.

ZENAIDA COMPLAINT
Filed July 22, 2013
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpISFRvMlVDcENOam8/edit?usp=sharing

KRONK
Casey Anthony’s Motion to Dismiss Kronk Complaint was granted in part [paragraph 12 only of Kronk’s Complaint] and denied in part [all the rest of Kronk’s Complaint]. Kronk got to AMEND his COMPLAINT and re-filed it on November 26, 2013.

KRONK COMPLAINT
Filed July 22, 2013
[only paragraph 12 was dismissed by Judge]
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIazNVc3dmSDFHT1U/edit?usp=sharing

KRONK AMENDED COMPLAINT
Filed November 26, 2013
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIYU1DLWFveHBXYnM/edit?pli=1
Casey has 21 days to file Response/Answer – only address the new allegations and not those in the paragraphs this Court determined to be sufficient to state a cause of action against Casey.
 
ThinkTank said:
NEXT ZENAIDA and KRONK HEARING
January 14, 2013 at 11:00am in Tampa

- Kronk Complaint against Casey Anthony
- Kronk Determine Whether Proceeding Core

- Zenaida Complaint against Casey Anthony – dischargeability
- Zenaida Determine Non-Core Elements of Complaint


ZENAIDA
Casey Anthony’s Motion to Dismiss Zenaida Complaint was DENIED on Nov 5, 2013. Casey Anthony has 21 days to ANSWER [Nov 26, 2013].

Casey Anthony’s Motions to stop Zenaida from taking a deposition from Casey Anthony was DENIED, and Casey’s attorneys were sanctioned $ 500.

ZENAIDA COMPLAINT
Filed July 22, 2013
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpISFRvMlVDcENOam8/edit?usp=sharing

KRONK
Casey Anthony’s Motion to Dismiss Kronk Complaint was granted in part [paragraph 12 only of Kronk’s Complaint] and denied in part [all the rest of Kronk’s Complaint]. Kronk got to AMEND his COMPLAINT and re-filed it on November 26, 2013.

KRONK COMPLAINT
Filed July 22, 2013
[only paragraph 12 was dismissed by Judge]
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIazNVc3dmSDFHT1U/edit?usp=sharing

KRONK AMENDED COMPLAINT
Filed November 26, 2013
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIYU1DLWFveHBXYnM/edit?pli=1
Casey has 21 days to file Response/Answer – only address the new allegations and not those in the paragraphs this Court determined to be sufficient to state a cause of action against Casey.
Click to expand...


CORRECTION: Next Hearing is January 14, 2014 [not 2013]
 
OT so as not to confuse these cases, can an attorney who is working for free quit a case at any time or is he obligated/forced to stay until the end?
 
sleuthinforfun said:
Has she (or remaining attorney stuck with her) filed an answer, yet? Has the time passed? If so, she may be up chit's creek since no answer is as good as agreement.
Click to expand...

I am not sure when the "21 days" , for Casey to file an ANSWER to Kronk, began count down?

"21 days" from the filing of Kronk's Amended Complaint on Nov 26, 2013 - would be December 22, 2013 [NO ANSWER filed on Dec 22, 2013].

"21 days" from the filing of the Official Order, on January 2, 2014, regarding the Hearing held on November 5th, and regarding Kronk - would be January 23, 2014.

But .... next Kronk and Zenaida Hearing is January 14, 2014 -- so, maybe Casey's attorneys did not file an Answer [on only "new allegations"], and will just deal with it at the Hearing?

Casey's attorney's filed a Motion to Dismiss Kronk's Complaint on October 3, 2013 - which was DENIED [except for paragraph 12 of Kronk's Complaint].
 
watcher9 said:
OT so as not to confuse these cases, can an attorney who is working for free quit a case at any time or is he obligated/forced to stay until the end?
Click to expand...

I am not an attorney .... but the attorney must ask the Judge's permission to quit [Ferwerda got the Judge's permission to quit because she was "co-counsel"].

Casey's main bankruptcy attorney, David Schrader, has been on the case from the beginning, and filed papers saying he is working pro-bono, and he would have to get the Judge's permission to quit -- which I do not believe would be granted.
 
ThinkTank said:
I am not an attorney .... but the attorney must ask the Judge's permission to quit [Ferwerda got the Judge's permission to quit because she was "co-counsel"].

Casey's main bankruptcy attorney, David Schrader, has been on the case from the beginning, and filed papers saying he is working pro-bono, and he would have to get the Judge's permission to quit -- which I do not believe would be granted.
Click to expand...

Thanks.
 
RR0004 said:
The thing is, she didn't...and we've never seen this argued. Baez gets the write-off.
Click to expand...


My sister is an attorney and they don't get to write off unpaid debts from clients. She has one that owes her over 30k.
 
Camille said:
My sister is an attorney and they don't get to write off unpaid debts from clients. She has one that owes her over 30k.
Click to expand...
It really doesn't matter 'cause she purportedly didn't owe him anything. I would hope it would be questioned if he did. It wouldn't surprise me if he wrote a lot of stuff off as business expenses.

ETA: not sure how this works with individual states, but perhaps you can ask your sister about this...

When you declare a client debt unrecoverable, at that time you can remove the unpaid client costs from the liability account, and deduct them as an expense on your profit and loss.

http://pa-lawpracticemanagement.com/deadbeat-clients/
(interesting stuff mentioned in article)
 
Camille;10114067]My sister is an attorney and they don't get to write off unpaid debts from clients. She has one that owes her over 30k
Click to expand...

I am not sure I follow that logic. If your sister works for a firm and is paid a salary, then no, of course she can't write it off because it isn't actually owed to her, it's owed to her firm.

However, if your sister owns her own business, then she cannot be forced to pay taxes on money she has not received. So it is, in effect, written off. Anything you deduct (or do not have to claim such as 401K deposits) are not taxable.

Considering that it seems JB is in business for himself any money owed to him that is not paid will not be taxed. That makes it, effectively, a write off.
 
ZENAIDA and KRONK HEARING TODAY
January 14, 2014 at 11:00am in Tampa

- Kronk Complaint against Casey Anthony
- Kronk Determine Whether Proceeding Core

- Zenaida Complaint against Casey Anthony – dischargeability
- Zenaida Determine Non-Core Elements of Complaint


ZENAIDA
Casey Anthony’s Motion to Dismiss Zenaida Complaint was DENIED on Nov 5, 2013. Casey Anthony has 21 days to ANSWER [Nov 26, 2013].

Casey Anthony’s Motions to stop Zenaida from taking a deposition from Casey Anthony was DENIED, and Casey’s attorneys were sanctioned $ 500.

ZENAIDA COMPLAINT
Filed July 22, 2013
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpISFRvMlVDcENOam8/edit?pli=1


KRONK
Casey Anthony’s Motion to Dismiss Kronk Complaint was granted in part [paragraph 12 only of Kronk’s Complaint] and denied in part [all the rest of Kronk’s Complaint]. Kronk got to AMEND his COMPLAINT and re-filed it on November 26, 2013.

KRONK COMPLAINT
Filed July 22, 2013
[only paragraph 12 was dismissed by Judge]
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIazNVc3dmSDFHT1U/edit?pli=1


KRONK AMENDED COMPLAINT
Filed November 26, 2013
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIYU1DLWFveHBXYnM/edit?pli=1
Casey has 21 days to file Response/Answer – only address the new allegations and not those in the paragraphs this Court determined to be sufficient to state a cause of action against Casey.
"21 days" from the filing of Kronk's Amended Complaint on Nov 26, 2013 - would be December 22, 2013 [NO ANSWER filed on Dec 22, 2013].
"21 days" from the filing of the Official Order, on January 2, 2014, regarding the Hearing held on November 5th, and regarding Kronk - would be January 23, 2014.

Casey’s ANSWER filed on January 13, 2014 -- the night before the Hearing on January 14, 2014.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIMnE2aHJrcmFsZVk/edit?usp=sharing
 
Notice of Limited Appearance on behalf of the Debtor(s) in the above-captioned case for the sole purpose of attending the hearing regarding the Debtor/Defendant Deposition scheduled for January 23, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.

(NO HEARING, DEPOSITION ONLY)
Filed by J Cheney Mason on behalf of Defendant Casey Marie Anthony.
(Mason, J) (Entered: 01/14/2014)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIRG9Bd09ZeGtqNzQ/edit?usp=sharing
 
http://www.baynews9.com/content/new...icles/cfn/2014/1/14/hearing_today_in_cas.html

Hearing held in Casey Anthony bankruptcy case
January 14, 2014
TAMPA --
A hearing was held in Tampa Tuesday in Casey Anthony’s bankruptcy case.

Attorney's for Anthony and Roy Kronk were at the hearing at the federal court house in Tampa.

The hearing was a short one with a new hearing date set for both cases involving Zenaida Gonzalez and Roy Kronk.
 
ThinkTank said:
Notice of Limited Appearance on behalf of the Debtor(s) in the above-captioned case for the sole purpose of attending the hearing regarding the Debtor/Defendant Deposition scheduled for January 23, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.

(NO HEARING, DEPOSITION ONLY)
Filed by J Cheney Mason on behalf of Defendant Casey Marie Anthony.
(Mason, J) (Entered: 01/14/2014)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7DjeAMt_BpIRG9Bd09ZeGtqNzQ/edit?usp=sharing
Click to expand...
CM doesn't have anything better to do??
 
RR0004 said:
CM doesn't have anything better to do??
Click to expand...

I think it's a typo - the article talks about items of Charles Manson selling on the Murderabilia site, then later it mentions a 'Mason' greeting card selling for $170.....:rolleyes:
 
ThinkTank said:
http://www.baynews9.com/content/new...icles/cfn/2014/1/14/hearing_today_in_cas.html

Hearing held in Casey Anthony bankruptcy case
January 14, 2014
TAMPA --
A hearing was held in Tampa Tuesday in Casey Anthony’s bankruptcy case.

Attorney's for Anthony and Roy Kronk were at the hearing at the federal court house in Tampa.

The hearing was a short one with a new hearing date set for both cases involving Zenaida Gonzalez and Roy Kronk.
Click to expand...

I don't get it - what are these hearings all about- they have a meeting and all they do is schedule another meeting? Good thing it's nothing important! :banghead:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 200 more.
Total: 2,891 (members: 201, guests: 2,690)

Online statistics

Members online
201
Guests online
2,690
Total visitors
2,891
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
595,761
Messages
18,033,203
Members
229,767
Latest member
Tattooed_crybaby22
Back
Top