Lavender Moon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 867
- Reaction score
- 2,494
Bumping for Donna Lass
Thank you for reccomending the book, Dragonfyree. I think you brought up some interesting points. Great post.Has anyone read a book called "The Great Zodiac Hoax Of 1986" - by Thomas Henry Horan?
In it he goes to the actual police files and compares them against what Greysmith has written in his books and the differences are unbelievable.
The details about the second murder of Darlene Ferrin and Michael Megeau are almost totally different than what he writes in his book. I had always thought they were on a date and went to the park. But there was a lot of other things going on that night before they ended up at the park.
I have an Amazon Kindle Unlimited and a lot of these books, don't appear to be edited well, so a lot of grammatical errors, but the information is fascinating.
His main issue is that when people talk about Zodiac they are almost always quoting what Greysmith has said and not from actual police files. Reading directly from the files makes you wonder if there actually was a Zodiac killer, or were there several killers who get linked up together, resulting in none of them being solved.
I wonder if they've put the DNA through that company where they can locate relatives of the suspect and maybe track it down there, like they did the Original Night Stalker?
People want to believe Arthur Leigh Allen is the killer that they come up with incredible reasons why it's not his DNA. I read somewhere that they believed he had other people lick his stamps (really). Back in the day my grandmother didn't like to lick stamps, so she had this little wet sponge thing that she used, there would be no reason for anyone else to lick his stamps because DNA wasn't even on the horizon. If he really hated to lick stamps I would have expected no DNA.
Remember they wasted about 5 years on the Yorkshire Ripper case because they believed that a tape recording from the "killer" was real.
Has anyone read a book called "The Great Zodiac Hoax Of 1986" - by Thomas Henry Horan?
In it he goes to the actual police files and compares them against what Greysmith has written in his books and the differences are unbelievable....
... Reading directly from the files makes you wonder if there actually was a Zodiac killer, or were there several killers who get linked up together, resulting in none of them being solved...
The Hotel-Casino was in Stateline Nevada; no gambling in California. A Stateline address could be either Calif or Nevada depending on the location but anyone who describes their address as being in Stateline Calif technically lives in the city of South Lake Tahoe Calif. That was probably where Donna was living since it presumed that she was abducted from her apartment and South Lake Tahoe PD investigated her case. South Lake Tahoe was much larger than Stateline NV so most people who work in the Nevada Casinos live on the California side.There's a certain contradiction about the locations:
Robert Graysmith's book says the hotel and casino was located in Stateline, Douglas County, Nevada, and he did not mention where Donna's apartment was located; Charley Project says the hotel was located in South Lake Tahoe, California, while Donna's apartment was in Stateline, Nevada.
However, there are two locations with that name: Stateline, Nevada County, in California, and Stateline, Douglas County, in Nevada. According to Wikipedia, the Stateline in California is incorporated to South Lake Tahoe, California. So... I feel confused.
1976 California murder case FINALLY solved as killer of girl, 19, identified with DNA test | Daily Mail OnlineDorothy Jane Scott 5/28/80 and Janet Stallcup 12/19/76 http://truthontatelabianca.com/threads/mona-jean-Gallegos.3434/page-2
Mentioned this before , has anyone found more details on the allegation that items of Donna’s were found in a “shallow grave” ?
Mentioned this before , has anyone found more details on the allegation that items of Donna’s were found in a “shallow grave” ?