photographer4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2014
- Messages
- 3,296
- Reaction score
- 18,833
I don't know as I've not watched the re-enactment videos. But it does seem that the narrative they've pushed for years (if not decades) has been that she didn't make it to the pool area. We're not told how they may have verified this or why they may have come to believe that aside her friend waited for her and watched the elevator for a few mins before contacting mum. I wonder if that 15yr old witness who told the reporter that she knew Nicole and had seen and talked to her that day ever told police her information? Its possible she didn't.I agree very maddening. IMO after 50 years the culprit will not face the justice they deserve regardless if caught and prosecuted, so why not release more info and let the case be solved.
I am assuming if this evidence that she was seen at the pool was not included with the reenactment video that was published by LE decades after the abduction then it was not in fact a clue in this case. The video and all police released info have her taken before entering the pool area.
If Nicole WAS at the playground that day, would she have been there just in her swimsuit running around? I'm not sure. Such a hard, and sad case! I feel like there may have been things missed at the time that could have helped to solve her case and that they were missed because police were confused, and maybe discounted somethings they shouldn't have or assumed people had their dates mixed up as to when they saw / spoke with her.