pageantmom
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2013
- Messages
- 175
- Reaction score
- 83
R
I’m just saying it makes no difference if they did or not. That’s not why he murdered them, regardless.
To act as if they couldn’t possibly have said anything to him- or to act as if it’s somehow victim blaming- is to say that he would have some justification here, and he does not. It makes zero difference if they said anything or not, because regardless it’s no excuse for his choice to murder.
But you said they *didn’t* say anything to him. None of us could possibly know that.yes , but it has been a popular assumption on this thread that should not be made...it is not factual and making up excuses for why RA murdered them is pure speculation and unfair to the victims. One example, a man murders his wife..no one was there but all the neighbors say she probably smarted off to him. I don't think anyone should put words in the mouths of the victims. continuously adding this (untrue and unknown) tidbit eventually makes it become part of the story. That is the danger...it's untrue and has no basis in fact. it is total fiction. mOO
I’m just saying it makes no difference if they did or not. That’s not why he murdered them, regardless.
To act as if they couldn’t possibly have said anything to him- or to act as if it’s somehow victim blaming- is to say that he would have some justification here, and he does not. It makes zero difference if they said anything or not, because regardless it’s no excuse for his choice to murder.