“I know we are not getting any help from the detective on this case. He doesn’t feel like it’s fit for us to have cadavers and dogs out here to find my baby’s scent, which I think is bull****,” Natasha Hayes said.
A woman who didn’t want to share her name came to the pond to pay her respects to those lost and express frustration with police.
“If it was my kids or my brother or my nieces and nephew, I would have wanted somebody out here on Thursday or Friday when they reported it,” she said. “When the family’s begging and pleading you to get out on this pond, that’s what they’re here for, is to protect and serve. But they failed.”
“They had one drone,” the family friend said. “A drone can’t see through these woods. A drone can’t see down in this water.”
IMPD wouldn’t talk about this case specifically on Wednesday.
But they said in general, in missing persons cases, they work lots of leads and need specific evidence from multiple clues to guide them into water — more than just a cell phone.
“It’s helpful, but it’s one piece. It’s one piece and so what we’re always looking for is pull together multiple pieces of information,” said Cmdr. Matthew Thomas with IMPD Criminal Investigations. “We look at license plate readers to see if a vehicle was in an area, cellular technology. We may also look at public safety cameras, more recently drones. We’ll use those to conduct preliminary assessments of an area to look for specific evidence that would lead us to believe that a person that is missing is in a specific location within a body of water or a wooded area or something like that.”
Family members of Kyle Moorman want to know why police didn't search the pond where he and his three children were found sooner.
www.wthr.com