Agreed, Ann. It will probably also help the Crown's narrative in their closing arguments. A lot of things that are coincidental and may seem insignificant in isolation will come together to tell the story and build the Crown's theory.
I think that's exactly what the problem is for me. Anybody can selectively pick pieces of a life and string those together and call them a story. We should see the fallibility in this given the two distinct arguments of two different crowns for why one guy bought the same incinerator. It's got to hang together at both a head and gut level, and it's just not a cohesive story for me yet.
+