Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
want more proof it's grime in KCMO? the khaki's grime wears in this vid are exactly the same ones he's wearing at LI's house in the pic i posted:websleuther:In general a great video
the 1st moment I saw that case I looked at the google map, that river made me very nervous... it is walking distance from the house and it appears alot of rain made it flow very fast. Someone told me they have found and suspected many a body have been tossed in that river. It is just my opinion but I had visions of this scenerio over and over that made me very uncomfortable
Something that has bothered me from the begining was JI's statement about "some woman cheating on her husband...". That makes no sense at all! I could understand if he said "some woman that had just lost a baby, or was unable to have a child of her own". But how does he connect a woman cheating on her husband to stealing a baby?
I have always thought that he was referring to DB. I'm not sure if he actually knows now, or knew at the time, what really happened to Lisa. But I think his statement was a freudian slip and he either knew or suspected DB from the start. I believe that he suspected Lisa was not his, and had previously asked for a paternity test. DB panicked knowing, and or fearful, of what the test would reveal.
Not only is it far too coincidental, IMO, for a kidnapping to have taken place on the one night that he worked, it's also too coincidental for an accident to have happened that night. Just way too many coincidences surround that night any way you look at it. This has looked premeditated to me from the start. Eliminate any chance of JI finding out Lisa wasn't his, play the "victim" card, be the center of attention, and get a lot of sympathy in the process. I think DB was willing to CYA at any cost. Can't afford to lose that meal/box wine ticket!
And yes...the river.
Something that has bothered me from the begining was JI's statement about "some woman cheating on her husband...". That makes no sense at all! I could understand if he said "some woman that had just lost a baby, or was unable to have a child of her own". But how does he connect a woman cheating on her husband to stealing a baby?
I have always thought that he was referring to DB. I'm not sure if he actually knows now, or knew at the time, what really happened to Lisa. But I think his statement was a freudian slip and he either knew or suspected DB from the start. I believe that he suspected Lisa was not his, and had previously asked for a paternity test. DB panicked knowing, and or fearful, of what the test would reveal.
Not only is it far too coincidental, IMO, for a kidnapping to have taken place on the one night that he worked, it's also too coincidental for an accident to have happened that night. Just way too many coincidences surround that night any way you look at it. This has looked premeditated to me from the start. Eliminate any chance of JI finding out Lisa wasn't his, play the "victim" card, be the center of attention, and get a lot of sympathy in the process. I think DB was willing to CYA at any cost. Can't afford to lose that meal/box wine ticket!
And yes...the river.
I think what you have posted is a very likely possibility. Especially from what I have learned about her personality from social media, I can see this happening for sure.
http://www.kshb.com/dpp/news/region_missouri/northland/lisa-irwins-parents-to-speak-with-today-show
Did anyone hear this interview and wonder why when asked about the lie detector test DB totally did not answer the question
I heard every one of DB's interviews and have to say that on every single one, I wondered why she said something she said or didn't say something she had before. She has shown herself to be contradictory in her statements/interviews, and that is NOT something that an innocent mother does.
Yea i draw the line when anyone does not answer a simple question but rambles on about all sorts of other stuff instead, BIG RED FLAG
How MASSIVE does it get to be before people agree this is a strange case i wonder