cocomod
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2011
- Messages
- 5,912
- Reaction score
- 18,434
I have some very close friends that are law-enforcement. Believe me when I tell you that I more likely than not will side with law-enforcement. However, I am not blind! In this case, law-enforcement officials did not follow proper protocol! Their “investigation” was pathetic at best.
I do believe in our American justice system as well. I believe that some conversations on this thread tonight mis-state what we believe it should be in a court of law. A defendant does need to prove their innocence, but first and foremost it is the job of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It is not the defense’s job to prove innocence if there is no proof of guilt.
At this point in time, I doubt anyone who has watched or paid attention to the case up until this point would see BARD. The prosecution has spent more time trying to prove that it was snowing outside, that a group of people went to the bar, and that the defendant wanted pizza that night. Obviously they have not finished their case, but I see no smoking gun - h311, at this point in time, they have only proven that JO died in the snow.
I do not know how people can say. She is getting away with murder. I cannot say what happened to JO that night. I definitely cannot say that she hit him with her car because the evidence does not prove that.
It is funny that people keep saying that those who support KR must be conspiracy theorists; however, there is an FBI investigation going on.
I do believe in our American justice system as well. I believe that some conversations on this thread tonight mis-state what we believe it should be in a court of law. A defendant does need to prove their innocence, but first and foremost it is the job of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It is not the defense’s job to prove innocence if there is no proof of guilt.
At this point in time, I doubt anyone who has watched or paid attention to the case up until this point would see BARD. The prosecution has spent more time trying to prove that it was snowing outside, that a group of people went to the bar, and that the defendant wanted pizza that night. Obviously they have not finished their case, but I see no smoking gun - h311, at this point in time, they have only proven that JO died in the snow.
I do not know how people can say. She is getting away with murder. I cannot say what happened to JO that night. I definitely cannot say that she hit him with her car because the evidence does not prove that.
It is funny that people keep saying that those who support KR must be conspiracy theorists; however, there is an FBI investigation going on.