astheworldfallsdown
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2019
- Messages
- 2,555
- Reaction score
- 17,711
Maybe if there are other unknown victims of CB or victims of the mobile number owner, this might encourage them to come forward?
JMO
JMO
They’ve now named one of the owners of the number. Wild move! Presumably to smoke that person out.
Ah ok. These threads move quite fast. Will have to look for the timeline again.He was in Bavaria! This is why I keep banging on about it!
Ah ok. These threads move quite fast. Will have to look for the timeline again.
Not meant at all with any malice - nuance is hard online!
A couple of highlights from new "Der Spiegel" article:
- Based on documents obtained by "Der Spiegel", the presumed murderer fantasized about kidnapping and sexual abusing a child in an online chat room.
- He wrote that he "wanted to catch something small and abuse it (the child) for days".
- In response to a chat room visitor who responded that this would be a dangerous undertaking, CB responded "not if you destroy the evidence afterwards".
- Investigators are working on confirming/ruling out that CB is connected to the missing persons case of 5 year old Inga (also blond), who went missing in 2015. At the time, CB lived 90 km from where Inga was presumably abducted.
- And then it cut me off and asked me to subscribe...
Maddie McCann und der Mordverdächtige Christian B.: "Etwas Kleines einfangen und tagelang benutzen" - DER SPIEGEL - Panorama
Was he in the same area as Inga went missing, can't find much on this case, was he a suspect in this before being suspect for maddie?
I ran again the number like the tweet said. I found something.I wonder if they have now disabled their account. Here’s the link to the original chap: https://twitter.com/wallyspire/status/1268300328459534340?s=21
hope this is allowed, will remove quickly if not.
I ran again the number like the tweet said. I found something.
I stored the number by "Maddie Caller" and yep, still active on Snapchat.
Note: my other contacts are redacted because they have nothing to do with the case and they don't need to receive a barrage of abusive messages when they have nothing to do with the case.
No way!
I clearly have no ideaIn your opinion, do you feel it’s most likely that this is significant, or that the press have run similar checks and named an innocent snapchatter?
Can be anything actually.Someone also pointed out the numbers after the username could well be a date of birth.
I ran again the number like the tweet said. I found something.
I stored the number by "Maddie Caller" and yep, still active on Snapchat.
Note: my other contacts are redacted because they have nothing to do with the case and they don't need to receive a barrage of abusive messages when they have nothing to do with the case.
No way!
Complete speculation and I apologise if not helpful:-
but it would be complete sense for an offender to contact someone who was keeping an eye on the parents eating to assess whether they were free to enter.....
Complete speculation and I apologise if not helpful:-
but it would be complete sense for an offender to contact someone who was keeping an eye on the parents eating to assess whether they were free to enter.....
In your opinion, do you feel it’s most likely that this is significant, or that the press have run similar checks and named an innocent snapchatter?
Cross messages. Sorry [blush]
Cross messages. Sorry [blush]