It's not a witch hunt of a trial. Campaign finance laws have to be enforced no matter which political party it is and no matter how embarrassing it is whether it be democratic candidate John Edwards or republican Donald Trump.I think she cares about the witch hunt of a trial. I care about that. The FEC and the DOJ both found no reason to prosecute.
JMO
At issue is another fairly esoteric body of law: campaign-finance limits. These laws limit how much money people can contribute to political campaigns and how campaigns have to report what they take in and how they spend it. Outside parties can spend money on promoting candidates, too; those are called independent expenditures. But they can’t coordinate with the campaigns or candidates on how they plan to do so.
The goal of those laws — an important aspect of the issue at hand — is centrally to limit the corruption that could follow from a big donor bankrolling a candidate’s entire campaign. If, say, Google could simply put up a candidate and spend $1 billion getting her elected to the Senate, it would be hard for anyone to compete — and Google would have a presumably loyal senator sitting in D.C.