This is from a Feb 2012 article, Lima, Ohio:
"Lima Police Chief Kevin Martin said at a press conference Sunday that Copplers remains were found on February 8 when the city was in the process of demolishing Fryers former home. Authorities confirmed that the remains, which appeared to have been hidden in a
basement crawl space, were identified through dental records.
According to the Lima News, investigators had found Copplers hair, her school ID card, and a diary in previous searches of the house. The paper reported that the diary included statements indicating that she was being held against her will.
Martin said other searches of Fryers property since 2001 have included specially trained cadaver dogs and
special ground-penetrating radar, but they found nothing. Two detectives were on site for the demolition and the activity was halted when the remains were spotted. Investigators have not yet determined a cause of death and they are unsure if they will ever be able to figure out when Coppler was killed."
http://www.hlntv.com/article/2012/02/20/remains-girl-missing-1999-found-house-demolished
I missed this story when it happened in Feb 2012. I do not understand how a specially trained cadaver dog could have missed finding this body. But the more cases we see in which this type of dog is used, the more I have come to believe they may not be all that reliable.
Yet I know such dogs are used effectively during catastrophes such as earthquakes, etc. to find bodies.
Is it a matter of too many improperly trained dogs being used or what? Anyone know? Can any dog handler just say "Oh, yes, my dog is a trained dog" and LE will use them?