Hi, vadersbabe, I am one of the newer members also and had the same startling response to the fact that there so many missing and unidentified people. I did visit the doenetwork, and it is shocking.
Honestly, though, I am only able to look at the photo of this dead child if I link to the discussion in his thread. I don't particularily wish to view it unexpectedly in every comment thread. I have only seen websleuths in it's current text-only format, because I joined during the time when the server problems were being worked on. I hope it will still be a readable discussion forum when the pictures return!
I can't seem to get out of my head, "M"'s story as to how her mother purchased this boy, regularly abused him and how he met his death. While I know that the investigators have looked into her story and concluded that there was not enough evidence to corroborate her story, she does mention some things that make me scratch my head. First, she told investigators that she helped her mother dispose of the boy. They were on the side of the road when another car came by and stopped, thinking they needed assistance. "M" said that she and her mother turned away and hid the license plate marker. It was brought to light years ago that a man came forward and told police about a car on the side of the road a few days before the boy was discovered. This man said he stopped to help a car on the side of the road and when he approached them, he said the woman and boy moved to cover the license plate and trunk area of the car. I am not sure if this was a fact known by many as far as the investigation goes. It just makes me scratch my head.
good point, I wonder if there is anyway to look into that.I read on the website that the box the little boy was found in was from JC Penneys & that it held a bassinett. Is it possible the person who killed this little boy worked at Penneys and brought the box home?
That was one of my first thoughts, too. Extensive bruising on the legs could certainly be a sign of that.thank you-I thought perhaps he might have had some kind of crushing injury at some point that made his arms unable to be used for transfusions.
The chest scar sounds superficially like a chest tube, and the incision in the groin area could be from a inguinal hernia or undescended testes?
I have read some articles dated between 1908 and 1951 that indicate "exchange transfusions' were routinely done through the ankle. For example, one of the articles told a story of a woman who had routinely suffered from "pulmonary hemorrages" and was on the verge of death. Her husband had a tube placed into his wrist (artery) and then she had the other end placed into her ankle. his blood flowed from him into her and saved her life...this was in 1908. There are also some articles indicating that it was routinely done on pediatric patients who needed transfusions...up until the 1970's.
I wonder if he was a hemophiliac?
That was one of my first thoughts, too. Extensive bruising on the legs could certainly be a sign of that.
Great! Thanks for checking that out! With the scars and such...it does sound like this child could have been a patient with a medical condition to me. They should have records unless the Doctor kept them and he is no longer alive. (To you young sleuths...50 years is NOT that long ago. LOL)I actually emailed the VIDOQ Society with that question, and some of the information from the local hospitals that handled hemophiliacs during that time frame. I will post any responses I receive....
keep us posted. I wish he could have a name, but after this long I just don't feel it is possible.I actually emailed the VIDOQ Society with that question, and some of the information from the local hospitals that handled hemophiliacs during that time frame. I will post any responses I receive....