Hmm. Well, that's an odd way to go about things. I don't see how whatever BH did or didn't do or say in any way changes what can be proven that VDS did do or say- or I should say, lie about. BH could be a pathological liar who is mean to cats and hates unicorns, or other unlikeable traits, but that does not change any of the documented facts of what VDS did/said in either case, nor in other unsavory things like attempting to sell women in Thailand.
I know who I would prefer to meet in a dark alley.
But anyway, I'm wondering how you are going to be able to write a book about anything, really, unless entire chuncks of evidence are left out. Like the VDS knocking on an open door, realizing it's open, and then shutting it, knocking again, and then getting the desk to open it for him. How are you going to explain him purposefully locking himself out? Unless you somehow plan on speaking directly with VDS, I can't see how that can be addressed. I like, and believe in some conspiracy theories. I just don't like conspiracy theories for the sake of writing a book. In fact, I've realized that I don't think it's in good taste for anyone to be mentioning that they are writing a book (no matter what the subject), or hinting that they know information that will only be found in their book, on a board- and specific thread that deals with the murder of at least 2 women. It doesn't seem appropriate to me at all. Good luck with the book- it will be interesting to see if any of your theories pan out.
But that's just my thoughts.
Different topic- I have now read numerous theories of why VDS killed Stephany, many who claim that possibly he tried to rape her, and then got 'furious' because she was on her period.
That makes no sense to me. A woman certainly can be raped while on her period. Not only that, but honestly, I really have only known a couple guys who claim to not like having sex while someone was on their period, or to think that was a good reason to not have sex, unless the woman was not feeling well. I think most guys will take it when they can get it. I find it hard to believe that someone who was capable of killing a woman would have stopped raping her because she was on her period. Or that she said no to the rape 'because' she was on her period, and that angered him enough to kill her.
I am going to guess the truth will be the simplest explanation- that they went to his room to play poker on the laptop, that they argued about something, possibly his involvement with NH, and that he then beat her to death and robbed her. Based on how little it took to anger him enough to throw a glass of wine in someone's face, she probably said some nasty things to him as she attempted to leave, and he went ballistic on her. She was not reported as having been sexually assaulted, and was known to be a lesbian- I don't believe sex was a motive in this case at all.
If this wasn't such a tragic case, he'd be a prime candidate!
