Bats
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2021
- Messages
- 324
- Reaction score
- 3,268
LE know 100% he killed her. Phone pings. Possible CCTV. Possible witnesses. Possible DNA. Its all covered in the hundreds of comments. They probably have it all hence the murder charge.
But the question remains, if he remains silent, without a body, can they convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt that he killed her.
He had weeks to thoroughly clean his car, hide and destroy evidence, throw out clothes, clean the house and let scratches on his arms heal.
Only time will tell.
I disagree that LE know 100% that he 'murdered' her.
Even by your assumption and the hundreds of comments, there is only possible CCTV, possible witnesses and possible DNA.
Yes, I agree that that LE are 100% confident they had enough evidence to charge him for murder, but that still doesn't mean he is 100% guilty. Far from it really.
Agree with you there...time will tell.