Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://www.sj-r.com/breaking/x65615268/Drew-Petersons-lawyers-bash-lead-trial-attorney
CHICAGO Lawyers working to overturn Drew Peterson's murder conviction accused his former defense attorney Thursday of blowing the case through legal errors and "a smorgasbord of ethical violations."
Brodsky stepped down from the defense team last month. Reached Thursday, he called the filing "a bald-faced lie" and said the entire legal team agreed to the trial strategy.
bbm
Hmmmmm. I guess I'll have to go back & review some articles.... That's not what I remember, but I could be wrong...:what:
Thanks, o'girl.
Hmmm 31 pages.... I guess if I'm gonna read this, I need to get a ham sammich, tea & a sleeping bag
Still enjoying your buttons, S'Dan!!!
http://petersonstory.wordpress.com/
Joel Brodskys filing to withdraw from Drew Peterson civil suit is mostly about Steve Greenberg. Read it here
It's a doozy!
Attorney Geenberg is acting not out of a desire to act in the best interest of his client, but isacting in such a manner in the post-trial proceedings because Greenberg suffers from a severemental illness known as pathological narcissism (DSMIV-TR 301.81
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...w-peterson-jeff-ruby-20121220,0,3622887.story
The outspoken, cigar-chomping Cincinnati restaurateur who was arrested during the Drew Peterson murder trial for mouthing an expletive to Peterson during a courtroom break will have the charges against him dropped if he stays out of trouble here for the next four months, a special prosecutor said.
By Adam Sege Tribune reporter
4:08 a.m. CST, December 22, 2012
In a continuation of the public falling out between two men who have represented Drew Peterson in court, attorney Joel Brodsky alerted police this week to an email from attorney Steve Greenberg that Brodsky claims made a threat against him.
“I think the courtroom is the proper place to enter this out,” Greenberg wrote in the email, a copy of which was provided to the Tribune. “I hope to see you there and that you will withdraw this filing. Please believe me when I tell you this kind of filing can only hurt you, it will have no effect on me or the case.”
Brodsky does not explain in the motion the legal relevance those claims have to his request to withdraw from the civil case, which Greenberg was never part of. But he argues later in the motion that because of what he calls an "unfathomable error" by Greenberg, Brodsky expects to be called before a grand jury investigating Peterson.
Greenberg's alleged error is quoting from a letter Brodsky sent Peterson in November in which Brodsky allegedly threatened to reveal damaging information about Peterson if he were removed from the case.