The coroner was asked whether she requested the medical records and she said no because it took a couple of weeks. Her son (Garth?) also shared that prescription. It seems there were at least two unhappy people in that house.
I want to feel sorry for his children and I will if any of them come clean and stand up for Tammy. I feel sorry for Colby. All accounts are his mom was very good until she wasn’t. He is disgusted by her.
I hope so. Would her doctor testify, or does HIPPA prevent that?
Oh, JP? Yeah. I hope he had horrible nightmares last night.
I think HIPPA only applies to the living. Since Tammy was possibly murdered, he could testify.
And the coroner said Garth was emotionless. I picked up on that right away.
I think her doctor could testify. I don't believe that HIPAA applies once the patient is deceased. [I'm not certain of that, though.] It would be great if her treating physicians would testify -- the doctor(s) that prescribed her medication.
You have a kind heart. Her actions when the kids were recovered in her dad’s yard were deplorable. She stuck her tongue out. Think of that!
Not to bring another case up, but here goes: reminds me of the Suzanne Morphew case -- the behavior of Barry Morphew and his two daughters.
I followed that case as well. MM1 and MM2 as we referred to them were very much in their Dad's corner and it was sickening. They were also still in school and probably relying on Dad to pay their way.
I bet her coworkers at the school talk about her when she's not around a lot. Mormon News Network's gossip hour segment.
I’m pretty sure that HIPPA applies for 50 years after death - BUT - HIPPA is for health records and insurance and such. I don’t think whether a doctor can disclose information or testify would be determined by HIPPA but by the AMA Code of Medical Ethics (see the link). It appears to me it would be allowed for 2 reasons. 1) If required by law - I would take that to include a subpoena or 2) when it would benefit the community - I would take that to include convicting a dangerous murderer.
I follow that case as well. Very disappointed especially in the youngest daughter lying for her dad. But she was a teenager and likely pressured by her older sister.
I heard the testimony but don’t remember it well or who gave it. LE probably. I’m sure he was able to transfer those monies while awaiting trial.
Yes. MOO
I heard, or read, something about when Chad was being taken away by LE, the day the bodies were found, he told Emma "I'm not coming back" (meaning, he knew he was being arrested and that it was for what was found on his property), he handed her his wallet from the police vehicle. He then briefly discussed his finances that Emma would have to take care of -- to include making sure LV's prison books were going to continue receiving funds. [But, apparently Emma already had that covered, as she had been communicating with LV and putting money on LV's books]. He also told her to go into his house, and (in Mark's? room -- one of his sons) in the room of his son, in the middle drawer (of a dresser, or desk) were two envelopes, each containing cash. She should retrieve that money. I don't recall the total amount, but I think it was between $8,000 and $9,000.
Was it not the first witness, the police officer?
