UK UK - Sarah Everard, 33, London - Clapham Common area, 3 March 2021 *Arrests* #8

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know if Specialist Crimes Command covers crime relating to current police officers?

The below is from the Met Police News update on the 7th March - when they said the SCC were taking the lead due to the complex nature and concerns for her welfare - this was announced at the same time as announcing the doorbell camera footage - IMO - I wonder WC might have been spotted on that footage too.

Detectives investigating the disappearance of Sarah Everard have released new information about where she was last seen.

33-year-old Sarah was spotted on CCTV at approximately 21:30hrs on Wednesday, 3 March. She was walking alone on the A205 Poynders Road, from the junction with Cavendish Road, in the direction of Tulse Hill.

Sarah had been at a friend's house in Clapham that evening. At approximately 21:00hrs, she left the property in Leathwaite Road through a back gate onto the A205 South Circular and began walking to her home address in Brixton.

She is thought to have walked across Clapham Common and was expected to arrive home approximately 50 minutes later. It is unclear if she returned to her home address. She has not been seen or heard from since.

An extensive investigation is underway, including searches and house-to-house enquiries to establish whether there were any further sightings of Sarah beyond that which was captured on CCTV.

The investigation continues to be treated as a missing person's enquiry but due to its complex nature and concerns for Sarah's welfare, the Met's Specialist Crime Command has now taken the lead

CCTV confirms last known sighting of missing Sarah Everard
 
The first apparent directed activity, I recall, was on Tuesday 9th, in the late afternoon, when Poynders Road was cordoned off and the area around Poynders Court was searched. Before this it had been Clapham Common, including the areas of open water, but a general search, not forensic.

My thoughts are that is was on this afternoon that credible evidence was recovered, possibly CCTV, that identified SE and some activity near a vehicle which was later identified and tracked to WC's home address.

I suspect they may have had no idea he was a police officer until they arrested him.

JMO

Only speculation & JMO but if perhaps the car was hired in wife's name would that be a reason for the suspicion of "assisting"?
 
That's what I thought, but now we're hearing he was under surveillance?

Just looking now and the surveillance quote has not come from the authorities. It was a comment from one of WC neighbour's. And only mentioned the surveillance car present in the hours up to his arrest.

Bus CCTV 'led to murder arrest' of officer 75 miles away in Sarah Everard case

Sure I saw a report that said he had been allowed to keep working so as not to raise suspicion but that could have just been what I read on here with no source to back it up so really not sure on that.
 
I think so and it was a lot of media coverage by family and friends eventually that seemed to instigate the case taking off IMO. Nothing much seemed to happen at all for the first week. Then it all happened at once.

Very true, MSM were all wound up with a couple from California over the weekend so this news was pushed down IMO.
 
No idea he was police? Wouldn’t they have done at least a basic background check up on him before arresting him at his home? Also I thought there was significant main stream media reporting that his police locker had been searched prior to his arrest.

Of course. I recall reading about a covert search of his locker, his department head being summoned and notified by the Commissioner and directed surveillance being authorised.

It was all specific information but in the Daily Mail, I believe. I'm not sure it's been reported anywhere else?

Sarah Everard: 'Murder suspect' Met officer found via CCTV from bus camera | Daily Mail Online

The commentary on the actions regarding the surveillance are all "would have" as though it's a hypothetical scenario without any genuine insight.
 
Last edited:
From the Guardian..........

“The IOPC’s investigation follows a conduct referral from the MPS in relation to two officers, received last night, which is linked to four other referrals. They are all connected to the arrest of a serving MPS officer on suspicion of kidnap, murder and a separate allegation of indecent exposure."


“Our investigation will look at the actions of the MPS after police received a report on 28 February (2021) that a man had exposed himself at a fast food restaurant in south London.”

The IOPC will investigate the claims about the indecent exposure allegation independently.

Sarah Everard suspect: Met faces inquiry over indecent exposure claim
 
From the Indie............

"The police watchdog has launched an independent probe into whether officers responded appropriately after they received a report on 28 February that a man had exposed himself at a fast food restaurant in south London.

The Met Police (MPS) said it voluntarily referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) in relation to the pair.


A separate investigation will look at the actions of police after they received a report of Ms Everard’s disappearance."

Met faces investigation over indecent exposure report in Sarah Everard case
 
Could also just be there wasn't enough evidence regardless of prioritisation and it's only with details from the SE case they've made the link e.g. phone records showing him in the location of the assault.
I guess they realised where he was working and plotted his route home through the crime scene.
 
Except according to that report they are not investigating them now.
Ah, no.
Five referrals to watchdog as serving officer questioned over Sarah's murder
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) has so far confirmed it will probe one relating to the Met's handling of an indecent exposure complaint made against suspect Wayne Couzens, 48, in the days before the 33-year-old marketing executive's disappearance.

Also
A further voluntary referral was made for a conduct matter in relation to the police investigation into the separate allegations of indecent exposure. The IOPC have determined this will be subject to an independent IOPC investigation.
IOPC referrals in connection with Sarah Everard investigation
 
rbbm.
Sarah Everard search updates as suspect taken to hospital with head injuries
''Police thoroughly searched inside and around a block of flats on the stretch of road Sarah Everard was last seen.

For many locals who have been following the case of the missing 33-year-old, this was too close to comfort.''

...''A resident of Poynders Court, told MyLondon: "First it was all on [Clapham] Common then it was getting closer and closer.

"It was that road, then this road, then this block."

It has also shaken up local's understanding of their neighbourhood, which until now felt safe.

Heidi continued: "I haven’t ever felt unsafe here.''
 
I guess the door cam footage could be from a supermarket or takeaway place

The image of SE on the evening she disappeared does not appear to be from residential doorbell cam but of SE entering a building, be it a shop or foyer to some flats?

Many of the papers report that it is taken as SE walked along Poynders Road near to Cavendish Road at about 9.30 p.m.

There are no shops I can see in the immediate area of this location and nothing that would fit the picture (door surround/paving slabs/floor tiles) is apparent.

My thought is that the image and report is a composite of a clear image of SE, possibly entering a shop earlier in the evening, combined with the location and time she was last seen from the doorbell cam.

This may have been done to focus drivers and residents minds on the location, time and description as they were asked to check for dashcam or CCTV footage around this time/location.

I don't think the doorbell cam image has been released to the press and public.

Sarah Everard: new CCTV footage of missing woman emerges

Sarah's phone signal was last picked up in the 'area' of Clarence Avenue. Clarence Avenue is is a couple of left turns passed Poynders Court on the A205 heading east.

Sarah Everard: Met police 'concerned' for missing woman

MOO
 
Last edited:
Hi, long time lurker, but newly signed up member. I’ve caught up on old cases here but never had reason to comment before.


I’m local and like many women see my self in SE and I thought I would give my two cents…or pennies.


MOVEMENTS

Knowing the area, the 14 min call to her boyfriend that ended normally was almost certainly a ‘safety call’ to accompany her along the common. She unlikely cut across it but the road can be a little creepy - it’s well lit and busy at that time of night but the common obviously isn’t. JMO

[I used to sell Christmas trees near to the snack cabin and locking up on my own at night was always a little scary. Especially as a 5’4 blonde woman. :/ MOO ]

It makes sense that her call took her into the busier high street. I believe police were investigating that angle re: CCTV as soon as possible. Unfortunately, as we’ve seen, there’s not as much as you’d hope. Searching the common was good from a media standpoint but not likely to reveal anything. JMO

I believe she would not easily be redirected from her stated walking route and I would confidently rule out an accidental or ‘planned’ RTC. It’s a busy road. I walked it at 8.40pm on Friday evening and the pavements are wide, fairly good street lights with traffic flowing in both directions and enough people to make this VERY tricky to pull off. There are some bits that are not so friendly. I’d be walking close to the road…JMO

From the get-go this reminded me of Sian Callagan and Christopher Halliwell. She’s got into a car willingly. I hoped LE were following the same hypothesis and the searches of the common and nearby areas were more about convincing the perp they had no leads and giving the community reassurance. JMO


HOW DID HE GET HER IN THE CAR?

I’ve been trying so hard to think about what would ever get me to get into a car with a stranger (I know connection is unverified as yet but stranger appears to be the working theory). If, perhaps, he pulled over and showed her his warrant card, explained that there had been a recent attack on a young woman and there were unmarked police in the area looking for the perp, 'he was last seen up ahead' etc etc. ‘My partner’s with the victim now but I’ve been asked to escort women or urge them to be careful…how much further do you have to go?’

As we’ve heard on here, police lifts home are a thing, and WC reportedly comes across friendly…any level of confident urgency ‘I can’t stop here long - can’t give the game away, hop in the back’ (he has stuff on the front seat, police radio even, he looks and sounds legit) might well have seen me make a split decision that cost me dearly. I like to think I’m pretty savvy with all the true crime I devour but who ever really knows? MOO

HOW DID HE GET HER PHONE?

This is the one that baffled me for ages. He would know to turn it off asap. Here’s my theory. JMO. I’ve filled in details that are of course all conjecture but have helped me understand a scenario that this would work.

Immediately that she gets in, he asks her for directions, [no red flag] crucially he says something along the lines of, ‘can you get your address up on your phone? I’ve got half an ear on what’s going on in the case’ by this I mean radio chatter - he’s got an earpiece in or has just tuned his radio in to local LE chatter so he can’t concentrate on directions. Maybe he even makes a pretend call over radio to say he’s picked a young lady up to take her to her address. She, at this point, isn’t alarmed and is getting her directions up on her phone/holding it out. They drive a little more and now she can’t call her boyfriend to let him know because WC is ‘following her directions’. He establishes if she lives alone maybe - all plausible and believable if the scenario is that of another predator out there. He gets the info he needs. He takes the phone, under the guise of seeing it better or simply because this is now his move. The windows are blacked out, the child locks are on. Has he disabled the windows?…he’s a mechanic. MOO


[My friend recently related how she won’t get cabs on her own anymore because when a cabbie started being a bit off, she started recording on her phone in her lap. He saw and grabbed it and continued to drive without giving it back. He eventually stopped, opened his door, put it on the ground and drove over it, and then told her to get out. It happened quickly, she was drunk and was absolutely terrified.]


WHAT HAPPENED NEXT

is anyone’s guess…and doesn’t bear thinking about but I think we know roughly the conclusion.


HOW I THINK THEY CAUGHT HIM

Just like in the Sian Callagan case I believe they get CCTV (from a bus?) that flags his car as one of interest. A quick check reveals it to be a member of LE. This has to be handled very carefully. They can’t spook him, what if he has her alive somewhere but feels the net closing in and takes her life and then his? Or takes his life and they never find her. LE continue to make a show of searching in the wrong areas while investigating WC.

I think I’m right in saying someone claiming to be LE contacted a member of WS to ask about CCTV footage. I don’t want to read too much into this but as our friend who reported that has not come back to verify or deny claims, (that I can see?) I think that after contacting LE to flag the interaction (they have the phone number saved) they have been asked not to put any more info into the public sphere - they may be called upon in a trial and is now a witness.

This cemented WC as a POI for inserting himself into the investigation through unofficial channels and, as someone said, not declaring his presence in the area to LE. That combined with the Indecent Exposure report...This ‘complex’ investigation is ‘moving at pace’. JMO. *** Edit by me - must have missed the confirmation that this LE contact was in fact, legit. Disregard ***

Just like with Christopher Halliwell they had him under surveillance, hoping he would reveal a location for SE. The ‘hat’ found on the common, so well presented and photographed, seems like more smokescreen to make him think they aren’t on to him. They want him to confidently return to where he's dumped her to check she's concealed/destroy evidence. However, after he stayed home all weekend they decide to step up the ‘forensic’ work on Poynders road on the left hand side of the road (leaving London) perhaps in a new attempt to get him to make a move they could follow that would incriminate. They have to always consider that she is alive and held somewhere. Preservation of life is crucial and paramount. If they go in and arrest him now he could say nothing and she may never be found. It’s a delicate balance of risk. They perhaps don’t have footage of her actually getting in the car. They will need actual evidence, they’ve got HIM but they want to find HER. JMO

Meanwhile they are also using ANPR to backtrack his movement that night. Quite possibly revealing a stop off at the golf course/leisure centre area. Possible that LE are covertly searching this but will not want to spook him if he decides to return to destroy/remove evidence. JMO

Eventually they decide to arrest. He’s not saying anything. He knows they have to build a case and if they don’t find her, he might beat it. JMO

Recent update on WC receiving a head wound….two scenarios possible. I’m not sure they’re getting anywhere with him either way.


Sorry for the lengthy post but I’ve been holding stuff in for days! Great to finally join you properly.

All JMO, MOO.
 
Last edited:
The image of SE on the evening she disappeared does not appear to be from residential doorbell cam but of SE entering a building, be it a shop or foyer to some flats?

Many of the papers report that it is taken as SE walked along Poynders Road near to Cavendish Road at about 9.30 p.m.

There are no shops I can see in the immediate area of this location and nothing that would fit the picture (door surround/paving slabs/floor tiles) is apparent.

My thought is that the image and report is a composite of a clear image of SE, possibly entering a shop earlier in the evening, combined with the location and time she was last seen from the doorbell cam.

This may have been done to focus drivers and residents minds on the location, time and description as they were asked to check for dashcam or CCTV footage around this time/location.

I don't think the doorbell cam image has been released to the press and public.

Sarah Everard: new CCTV footage of missing woman emerges

Sarah's phone signal was last picked up in the area of Clarence Avenue.

Sarah Everard: Met police 'concerned' for missing woman

MOO
Private doorcam footage was actually released on March7 according to this report.
All the key details from Sarah Everard search in last 24 hours
 
One small thing: the person on WS that was called by someone in LE after discussing it on Twitter with their real name - they did come back and say that it was checked out by the Met Contact Centre, and it was all fine apparently. This was in the deleted thread I believe.
 
One small thing: the person on WS that was called by someone in LE after discussing it on Twitter with their real name - they did come back and say that it was checked out by the Met Contact Centre, and it was all fine apparently. This was in the deleted thread I believe.
Thnks for this - hadn't caught that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
168
Guests online
3,887
Total visitors
4,055

Forum statistics

Threads
595,525
Messages
18,025,863
Members
229,674
Latest member
rapper_physicist
Back
Top