I like Mike Galanos, but why do these interviewers NOT ask the obvious follow-up questions? SHEESH. It is so dang IRRITATING.
LIke he asked, "What did Sarah say?" (Sarah was at the concert)
Gil: "Sarah said that Morgan called and said that she was outside and couldn't get back in and that she would get a ride."
Why didn't Galanos ask, "Get a ride with WHOM ?" DID SARAH ASK with whom she would "get a ride?" My God that seems so freakin OBVIOUS - especially when out of town. I mean it's not like you're down the street from your home and could get a quick cab or have all your hometown contacts handy.
Gil: "She sees herself as a big grownup woman." Well, she's 20 and a Jr in college living in an apt off compus. She is an adult.
OK y'all can heave tomaters at me, but it struck me weird that Gil said about Morgan, "She's gonna have some
'splainin' to do" ....'SPLAININ' ?... like Ricki Ricardo? Maybe she is in shock or denial, but that seemed so strange to me.
Not strange that she has hope that her daughter is coming back. Not strange that at the idea of Morgan having simply run off and terrified everyone and that Gil would, of course, expect an explanation. It wasn't either of those things. It was
how she said it; "She's gonna have some
'splainin' to do."
Also, someone here suggested that we note not only what the parents and LE say, but also what they
don't say. Galanos asked Dan about the ATM card activity and if LE had taken her computer. Dan said, "That is part of the investigation, so I'll refer you to them [LE] for that."
Another weird thing for me in
Angel Who Cares' video clip (thanks for that, AWC, BTW) - another weird thing for me was when Gil said, "Did someone put their arm around her and hustle her outside?" (implying against her will) Well, she called the friend from outside and didn't mention getting hustled or forced outside against her will. So that remark would only make sense if the "call" were actually a text (vs a call where they spoke) and that Morgan was not the sender of the text. Or perhaps Gil meant "lured" outside in such a way that she didn't feel threatened.
Some things are just missing. Someone here mentioned, if she planned to meet a dude in lieu of the concert,
why go inside at all?
And I know this is totally subjective, but she is unusually beautiful. Galanos asked about a possible boyfriend. Gil said, "She really has had few boyfriends... few steady relationships." Why? She's gorgeous; she is personable. She has at least 8 close girlfriends who they call, "The Nine" who have been friends for years indicating that she is personable and social. (iow, not anti-scoail or loner or nutbar) I cant help but wonder if the parents frown on the subject of boyfriends (whether overtly or covertly)
So if we go with that boyfriend theory for a second, why meet him at C'ville then? She has an apt. She doesn't live at home, so the 'rents (aka parents) presumably cant know her every move if she were trying to get some romantic time in or an over-nighter or whatever. Why meet him there? (if that's what happened.)
*sigh*
