strawberry
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Messages
- 12,052
- Reaction score
- 2,726
Well that's new information that they had a fling before college
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well that's new information that they had a fling before college
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ugh, typed a long response and I lost it!!
That IS interesting about the "fling".
What I find fascinating is the party that was mentioned. It raises so many questions for me.
If Nicole went to this HS party, would she not have gone with a friend; otherwise people at the party would know her and would have commented about how they saw her with David. And if she went with a friend, wouldn't the friend have come forth leaking all the information about how she and David were making out? I've heard about a party before in the past year, but I always brushed it off because of the lack of witnesses.
Or, perhaps David invited her to meet him there and no one at the party knew who she was. She would have had to have met him there, because he allegedly blacked out and woke up in a ditch- doesn't seem like he'd have the wherewithall to drive her home. Where was the ditch anyway?
Or, perhaps Nicole was never at this party. If he was as screwed up as he claims, he could have made out with anyone, and paranoia set it and maybe he ramped up his conversations with Nicole (and maybe other online aquaintances) to try to figure out who he made out with that night and how far it went? Maybe Nicole, being so naive and so eager for his conversations, played along.
Or maybe there was no party and David made the whole thing up to string Natalie along in a murder plot?
Filled with a lot of questions right now.
Interesting to read.
Keepers' Court Documents: Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Suppress
https://www.scribd.com/document/338992261/Keepers-Court-Documents#from_embed
That was interesting... I wonder what the boyfriend knows, if anything? What story did she tell him? I kind of feel for the guy, since he likely didn't know what a psycho she is...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
There is always truth weaved in with a lie. Nicole was found in a ditch. The ruse to get her out of the house was probably to attend a party. He most likely had sex at some point with Nicole and was worried about her being pregnant. Previous reports said that Keepers and David went to a restaurant and "planned" this, and she was "excited" about being a part of it. There was no party. The Tinder and KiK apps are more likely, and there is evidence to show David and Nicole communicated that way.
Judge considers new trial date in Keepers case
http://www.wdbj7.com/content/news/Judge-considers-new-trial-date-in-Keepers-case--414514883.html
Judge considers new trial date in Keepers case
http://www.wdbj7.com/content/news/Judge-considers-new-trial-date-in-Keepers-case--414514883.html
Interesting to read.
Keepers' Court Documents: Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Suppress
https://www.scribd.com/document/338992261/Keepers-Court-Documents#from_embed
No doubt Natalie will be called by prosecutors in David's trial, but I wonder if David will be called in Natalie's? We don't really know what if anything he has said to detectives and prosecutors. We don't know what he has said to his attorney. Most everything we have heard has come from Natalie's version of events. There either will be evidence to make that version believable, or there won't be evidence to support her claims.
I'm still not sure why both charges of being an accomplish before and after the crime aren't there. According to Natalie's story, she helped planned the murder AND was there for the disposable in NC.... yet she claims she didn't witness the murder. Whether that's true or not, we don't know.
Natalie isn't charged with murder, right? So having her trial first probably won't have much impact on David's trial. She can continue to claim whatever she wants at this point, however, I cannot see how she was this withering flower when she admitted to meeting at CookOut and planning this whole thing! Nope, she wouldn't have made statements that it was exciting! She was basking in the spotlight. She was eager to be a part of murder. No...that's not the signs of a withering flower. It makes her appear as a mastermind.
IMO, both will be found guilty, so doesn't matter who goes first, their lives as they knew them are over! David had the motive, and there must be evidence besides Natalie's story. From what I can remember, *memory is awful, and I'm trying to keep up with too many cases!* there was no evidence that we know of that Natalie and Nicole had ever communicated or met. Right? If so, David was the link. There's evidence he was in communication with Nicole, and I bet LE has lots more of that than we've heard about or seen.
For a guy who asked a gamer, someone he had never met, how to kiss, maybe David thought any sexual activity could get a girl pregnant. Maybe he thought that they had sex *RAPE* and therefore she was pregnant, when she wasn't. IF he was scared about a pregnancy, and used that as a motive, it could have been his imagination....with nothing said about it by Nicole. At 13, sure she could have become pregnant, but we don't know if she had ever had a period or not! Some people don't have one until later. Some much earlier. Could Nicole have thought she was pregnant because a period was late? I'm doubtful of that. Most girls I know didn't have normal periods as soon as they started. Some took 2 yrs or so to become monthly. Others, so irregular that it was every 2 weeks, with others every 3 months.
I am currently of the opinion that this duo wanted to kill someone, and Nicole unfortunately became their victim. Two people that were like a lighter and gas. Neither dangerous without the other, but combined, explosive. Having watched episodes on ID of couples that meet and murder, I feel that's where this case is.
Judge to allow cameras in courtroom for Eisenhauer, Keepers trial
http://wset.com/news/local/court-to-allow-cameras-in-courtroom-for-eisenhauer-keepers-trial