You're playing word games.
You suggested that AK based an entire murder conspiracy on the assumption that ILE would not be able to match RG's DNA and fingerprint, and would thus blame the crime on some unnamed intruder.
That's a lot to count on if AK knows nothing of RG's criminal history or prior encounters with police.
Yet elsewhere you claim AK spoke so little Italian she couldn't even carry on the simplest of conversations with the boys who spoke no English.
So without sharing one word in common, AK somehow conspired with RG to commit rape and murder, and then decided to leave RG's artifacts at the scene, confident that ILE wouldn't be able to trace RG's artifacts back to him (and then ultimately to her and RS).
I don't suppose you'll ever admit you understand why some of us find this preposterous.