BlueCrab said:
Hi Angel,
Due mainly to the lies and coverup being perpetrated by the Ramseys to protect Burke, and the pineapple evidence, my primary theory is along the lines of yours, BDI, with the exception that there was likely a fifth person in the house that night and that accomplice could have been the actual killer. There's too many crime scene items missing from the house, and a fifth person in the house removing the items is the most logical explanation for it.
My secondary theory would involve JAR. IMO either JAR or NI was the builder of the erotic asphyxiation device found wrapped around JonBenet's neck, and one of them was also likely the kid's mentor on how to use it. The Dr. Seuss book, the fibers from JonBenet, the blanket from his bed with his semen on it, all found in JAR's blue suitcase in the basement, is extremely suspicious. IMO the EA device was also kept in the blue suitcase, but was removed by the children and used to sexually experiment with it on the night of the killing. The result was the accidental asphyxiation of JonBenet.
BlueCrab
Hi BlueCrab,
You know I have a transcript (somewhere) of an interview Geraldo Rivera did with Alex Hunter I believe shortly before Hunter retired.
Geraldo asks him if there is "evidence of an intruder" and it's curious how Hunter responds.
He says, 'There IS
some evidence of intruder BUT - we are NOT looking only in the house... the case is much more complicated than that.'
Or words to that effect. I can find the transcript if someone wants exact quote.
Anyway, I think that is something that cannot be ignored. For years we've heard those involved in the investigation from Hunter to Dr. Henry Lee to Mike Kane on say that this case is very "complicated."
Now, a simple domestic familial homicide would not be characterized as "complicated." Nor would you need to state that the evidence they have is not only IN the home - but elsewhere as well.
The question is: WHERE?
I remember years ago there was a persistent rumor (by a poster named Lake I believe) that this crime was committed by JUVENILLES. Plural. And covered up.
Another rumor I recall, and goes along with the juvenille theory is that there were several kids outside playing during Christmas day at the White's and somehow JonBenet got shocked on an electric fence. Anyone else remember this?
Who knows what that was all about.
As for the JAR theory - I don't buy that one at all. His alibi was secure and he was cleared. States away at the time of the crime.
And he was old enough to be prosecuted in Colorado.
His semen present on a blanket in the house where he had a bedroom and lived sometimes is no suprise given his age. There is no evidence whatsoever that that suitcase or contents (in a totally different room from where JonBenet was found and the crime was done and/or staged) had anything to do with the crime. The blanket and book could have been put in there at some other time by the kids when they were playing.
I am confident that JAR was thoroughly investigated by the police and nothing was found to incriminate him.
Patsy was knee-deep in staging and covering up the crime and I do not believe she would have gone to those lengths for John Andrew.
Burke? Yes.
Herself? Yes.
John? Perhaps - but most likely not.
Something motivated the Ramseys to cover-up the crime and stage the crime scene. It is simply a given that they did this much at least.
So the question must be asked - WHO would they go to such lengths for?
Not only with the risk involved - but the incredible sum of money they've spent to keep it up.
Who?
For me, all indications suggest either Burke or Patsy.
~Angel~