This case has been on my mind recently for some reason, and there are a few nagging pieces that I can't get over. Mainly, why was no one else ever charged in either the act or the disposal? Something particularly obvious to me is the locations of disposal. These places weren't haphazardly chosen, as each of them share geographic similarities. They are all heavily wooded, yet easily accessible from the road, each of the sites has flowing water within several feet of where the remains were found, they're located in a pretty direct route while still remaining in somewhat backcountry and without using heavily traveled Hwy. 321. The patterns lead me to believe that an experienced hunter that has hunted in that area would have both knowledge of these places and a crude knowledge of anatomy, more specifically, dismemberment. It does not make sense that EB knew how and where to do this on her own. JMHO.