Knowing what we know now, that article is disturbing. I can’t read all of it but it makes me wonder if he goes on to say that Tammy tells him it’s ok to marry Lori. Several months ago, that was what he was telling people. Was this their source?
Why do you think they would delay because of that? For bail reasons?
For those who can't read it due to the small size of the attachment, it says:
Thanks to Nate and Jason!
Maybe because it’s a “custody battle” where they’re not trying to KEEP JJ, but instead get a million dollars for transferring custody of him to KW&LW? And KW&LW countered by saying they would just sue for custody based on LV trying to SELL her kid. So LV put the kids “into hiding” (Tylee first, to prepare the hiding place) to make sure KW&LW didn’t get custody through the courts.
And then KW&LW counter by sending evidence of CV’s murder to the police and then LVD counters by having Alex “die naturally” because what police dept is going to pursue a murder case when the murderer is dead too?
The only problem with all of this is it would require the grandparents to be hiding a lot of information, and also it’s completely a figment of my imagination.
I feel like they would get laughed out of court, Idaho would keep custody and the contempt charges would stand-- just like the Hawaii judge kept the bail at $5 Million. (I understand you were saying that first part is what they were doing before the court case came about and the idea was that they are using a general "it's about custody" and letting their followers come up with the explanation. But the hilarity of a lawyer trying to argue a case like that popped into my head as I read your post ).
BBM IMO This is the part that is concerning. How does he finish this statement? What was he “in the process of implementing “? He was married to Lori just 17 days later.
Just 5 days from when he published this. Yes, I too would love to know the rest of that story.
I'm guessing the delay to extradite may be to give time to prepare additional charges - against Lori but perhaps Chad as well... to ensure that bail is high enough that they can't cut the nut.I'm no attorney, but I'd like to see them try to argue that first part in court:
"Your honor, my clients know exactly where the children are but they are refusing to produce them unless they are first given $1 Million."
"No, your honor, my client doesn't care about having custody of the children, she only wants the insurance money that her murdered husband didn't leave to her."
"Yes, your honor, my client is aware that AZ law enforcement agencies are pursuing conspiracy to commit first degree homicide charges in the shooting death of her late husband, but that's all media hype and my client hasn't been charged with that yet."
On a another note, I wonder if their Idaho attorney is still representing them? We have not heard any statements from Attorney Sean Bartholick, of Rigby, Andrus & Rigby since December 23rd, 2019 when he said this:
“Chad Daybell was a loving husband and has the support of his children in this matter. Lori Daybell is a devoted mother and resents assertions to the contrary. We look forward to addressing the allegations once they have moved beyond speculation and rumor.”
Parents of missing Rexburg children issue statement, attorney says they are ‘loving’ and ‘devoted’
I don’t even know what to think.
Also worth considering these statements in the context of the time line....1o/28 (3days before this was posted) the bikes are moved to the Storage Unit.
He was scared and I believe his divorce lawyer told him to change beneficiaries. It makes sense if he knew that if something happened to him to give the money to someone that would actually take care of JJ. MOO
