If the defense attorney is organized with a team that knows their case, they can accomplish a lot in one hearing a month. Have seen it before, just come prepared to argue the motions already on the table. JMOAT: request two hearings a month.
Judge responded: once a month, preferably on Thursdays.
moo
We don't actually know if BK's phone was off or not - that was an allegation based on supposition by Brett Payne in the PCA.But if his phone was off during the murders and he is still using that as his alibi, wouldn't that be the equivalent of saying him saying "I was at work until midnight, and my boss can prove I was there."
The only time it matters is when the murders were done.
Anyway, sorry, common sense
IF BK's alibi is "nothing" why is the prosecutor trying so hard to get it withheld? If BT thinks this is a non-alibi or a weak alibi, he should be encouraging the defense to present it so he can easily destroy it in front of the jury and the jury will think it is BS. Why is BT so worried about the meta data and results SY found?Thu, May 2, 2024
Bryan Kohberger's alibi in tatters as prosecutors 'temper tantrum' rips claims apart
Bryan Kohberger's alibi in tatters as prosecutors rip claims apart
Bryan Kohberger is currently facing four first-murder charges for the death of four University of Idaho students killed in November 2022.www.the-express.com
Latah County Prosecuting Attorney Bill Thompson wrote: "With the exception of the reference to Wawawai Park (which is new), the defendant is offering nothing new to his initial ‘alibi’ that he was simply driving around during the morning hours of November 13, 2022.
"As the State noted during the August 2023 hearing, the State is aware that the defendant was driving around rural areas of Whitman County, Washington, and Latah County, Idaho, during the early morning hours of November 13, 2022.
"In fact, the defendant's travels during that time are described in the original Probable Cause Affidavit supporting the Criminal Complaint in this case."
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Former prosecutor David Gelman said: "The state’s response is short, sweet and to the point. What has been offered by the defendant as an ‘alibi’ is nothing of the sort.
"He has offered no specifics as to his location at the time in question, nor has he offered the names of those witnesses upon whom he will rely on to establish the defense.
"That is not an alibi as contemplated by the law. The trial court should not permit the defense to pursue an alibi defense, based on the scant information provided."
IF BK's alibi is "nothing" why is the prosecutor trying so hard to get it withheld? If BT thinks this is a non-alibi or a weak alibi, he should be encouraging the defense to present it so he can easily destroy it in front of the jury and the jury will think it is BS. Why is BT so worried about the meta data and results SY found?
There were legal filings in this regard:I don't see any signs of BT trying to suppress BK's alibi or being worried about cell tower data.
Does not even come close to meeting the definition of an alibis. I was looking at the stars!His alibi doesn't meet the threshold.
JMO