I would really like to know what RH meant by MISS-LEADERS under the heading PROBLEMS in his notes. All the other items are self-explanatory or can be easily figured out what he meant, but this particular one I can't figure out. I can't even come up w/any possibles yet. I saw someone in an earlier thread thought they knew what it meant, and another poster even agreed w/them, but I didn't see how it could be right, bc of the fact that he had listed this under PROBLEMS. I've forgotten what the other poster thought it meant, but I remember thinking that couldn't be it, because that really didn't fit as a "problem" for RH. So I'd like someone with more creativity than I have to see if they can figure out what he meant by MISS-LEADERS. Could it be a construction/architecture term? Was he ever in Mississippi? Did he mean the word 'mislead', like people who misled him, i.e. liars? Or things he wanted to keep in mind to more easily mislead others? (I think that's more what the other poster guessed he meant.)
Am I correct that he wrote these notes long after he'd killed his 1st victim allegedly? About 10 yrs after even? So he wasn't exactly a rookie at it, but he was obviously still working on improvements. It comes across to me as written after only say, 3 or 4, maybe 5 kills. But seems like there would have been many more in that many years, but maybe he was just slow starting, picking up speed (victims) later.
MISS-LEADERS... something he considered one of the many problems he might encounter, or already had encountered. I'm just drawing blanks. What could he have meant by that???
I think the sick freak meant "mislead," so people who've "misled" him. I don't know what anyone else views it as, but I thought that one was clear, it's just my opinion, though. Remember in his bail doc he was saying he was going to contact the SW later with "bed info"? He gets into details with these women before he meets them. Unknown to the women, he's getting details that will enable him in the crime. He probably tells them he's married and needs discretion, come alone. He's giving them a fabulous amount of money (supposedly), so they're not going to be inclined to argue. Maybe he says he wants total protection & privacy, no phone. (Amber went alone and didn't take her phone. I think others did as well. But of course we know others did bring the phones because
he was using the phones. I'm not saying this request would "always" be made, but perhaps "sometimes.") With some women, depending on the circumstances, maybe he's gotten personal information about backgrounds and relationships (like he's a repeat customer) and he's relying on it for whatever reason and then they may not have been "honest" with him. Maybe he's demanding a certain age range, to know "real hair color," what have you, and he's relying on this for his demanding "victim quality list," he's very angry if everything isn't "up to snuff."
But now that you have me thinking about it, maybe this is an indicator of "others" involved in his crimes, he's "drawing information" and doesn't know if he can trust the source. Obviously if he's getting his info from another criminal "pal," he knows how trustworthy he himself is, so he knows the "pal" is probably equally reliable, honest, and decent. This is where it could get very interesting. Because John Ray had one witness who was a SW who'd been threatened by RH (allegedly) and then (again, all allegedly) RH told her to get out of the car and get another client, which she did, and RH followed them until a cop ended up getting involved, and that was the end of it. Starts at about 19 mins on this press conference video:
What might something like that, if true, mean in terms of JBittrolff and his attorney's note about sperm/semen not being equal to murder?
www.newsweek.com
www.dailymail.co.uk
www.cbsnews.com
