Waxahachie1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2024
- Messages
- 88
- Reaction score
- 797
I take you point but with respect, I am compelled to point out that Jensen's statements as Stanley's representative and advocate can't be taken as unbiased support for what she did. And his argument that the evidence will fall short of the highest civil burden of proof (clear and convincing) is hardly a ringing, "My client did nothing wrong!"LS’s attorney is a former prosecutor, and supports her. This all stinks anyhow. Barry should be the one on trial.
JMO
Stanley’s lawyer, former prosecutor Steven Jensen, told the three-member panel considering the case in Denver that rural district attorney offices like Stanley’s do not have as many resources to handle high-profile cases as larger, urban ones.
[…]
The state will not be able to show “clear and convincing” evidence that Stanley violated ethical rules, Jensen said.
Colorado district attorney who prosecuted Barry Morphew faces disciplinary hearing
A lawyer for Colorado’s Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel described 11th Judicial District Attorney Linda Stanley during opening statements of the two-week hearing as an absent leader who failed to steer the case and let it crashcoloradosun.com
I totally agree that Morphew should be defending himself right now. Stanley's lapses are a major reason he is not in prison. They have complicated an already difficult case, notwithstanding the discovery of Suzanne's remains - and THAT stinks.
MOO.
Last edited: