MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #12

Status
Not open for further replies.
A very interesting point. So what we have here is...

Wolfe said if it's the arm being hit, he would expect shoes to stay on. If it's a full-body hit, then it is likely the shoes will come off. Wolfe testified earlier that he expected more damage to the car/near tail light if it was involved in a collision, he also testified that the damage to JO's arm was not consistent with being hit. So what's the situation with JO's shoes?!
obviously the shoe got where it did in some other way if we believe Dr Wolf
 
@JHall7news

ADA Lally does the cross examination. he asks if it's fairly common for a pedestrian to lose a shoe when being hit bay a car. Wolfe agrees that happens. But would not expect that if a car just hits a person's arm.


11:45 AM · Jun 24, 2024
 
But folks, that what experts witness testimony does and why it is so useless. All of the stories the defense is telling are plausible stories. They get to say anything they want to and they are not required to prove it in any way. They never have to be right, they only have to confuse you. They can accuse the Alberts, they can harass witness through surrogates, they can drag every police officer through the mud, they can berate the poor paramedics. They get to do all of that without any proof what-so-ever.

The expert testimony is summarized as: "We can't figure out how this happened so it probably didn't". We know because me and my friends myth-bustered a car hitting him..."

Its was almost idiotic what they said on the stand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
537
Total visitors
677

Forum statistics

Threads
627,096
Messages
18,538,110
Members
241,182
Latest member
MayBluebird
Back
Top