Nila Aella
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2022
- Messages
- 1,105
- Reaction score
- 9,085
JL Objection to protective order: June 22, 2023All this DNA talk reminded me of how DNA from three other unidentified males was found at the crime scene, including on a glove found outside. Does anyone else remember hearing that? Any guesses at to why those DNA samples weren't tested? The court hearing I believe on 8/18/2023 Anne Taylor asked for the results and Thompson claimed they never did the test so there was nothing to share with her. Seems odd if you ask me? Especially since they said it was male DNA. How would they know it was male DNA if they didn't test the DNA?
I linked an article but if you google it you can easily find what I am talking about.
Bryan Kohberger's defense claims Idaho murders suspect has 'no connection' with victims
Page 2
By December l7, 2022, lab analysts were aware of two additional males’ DNA within the house where the deceased were located, and another unknown male DNA on a glove found outside the residence on November 20, 2022. To this date, the Defense is unaware of what sort of testing, if any, was conducted on these samples other than the STR DNA profiles. Further, these three separate and distinct male DNA profiles were not identified through CODIS leading to the conclusion that the profiles do not belong to Mr. Kohberger.
I do recall BTs response during a hearing on the IGG saying something about the CODIS test did not exist, that the samples (all three) were not run through codis for eligibility reasons. So it appears LE did a test for male/female, but did not run the samples through CODIS. MOO
FAQ on CODIS and NDIS - Fbi:
18. Are there specific data requirements for the DNA records submitted to NDIS?
Yes. There are several requirements for the DNA data submitted to NDIS:- The DNA data must be generated in accordance with the FBI Director’s Quality Assurance Standards;
- The DNA data must be generated by a laboratory that is accredited by an approved accrediting agency;
- The DNA data must be generated by a laboratory that undergoes an external audit every two years to demonstrate compliance with the FBI Director’s Quality Assurance Standards;
- The DNA data must be one of the categories of data acceptable at NDIS, such as convicted offender, arrestee, detainee, legal, forensic (casework), unidentified human remains, missing person, or a relative of missing person;
- The DNA data must meet minimum CODIS Core Loci requirements for the specimen category;
- The DNA PCR data must be generated using PCR accepted kits; and
- Participating laboratories must have and follow expungement procedures in accordance with federal law.
19. What are the CODIS core loci?
Effective January 1, 2017, the CODIS Core Loci include the following 20 loci:- CSF1PO
- FGA
- THO1
- TPOX
- VWA
- D3S1358
- D5S818
- D7S820
- D8S1179
- D13S317
- D16S539
- D18S51
- D21S11
- D1S1656
- D2S441
- D2S1338
- D10S1248
- D12S391
- D19S433
- D22S1045
20. What are the minimum loci requirements for the STR DNA data submitted to NDIS?
The minimum CODIS Core Loci required for submission of DNA data to NDIS vary by specimen category. Generally, the CODIS Core Loci are required for submission of convicted offender, arrestee, detainee, and legal profiles.During one of the recent hearings (motion to compel), AJ from the state mentioned that the State facilitated testing of additional trace evidence, as requested by the D.
3:12
JMO