Kudzuu
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2019
- Messages
- 388
- Reaction score
- 2,560
Good heavens! This is all we need now is to say a drug addict's rights are violated. This is just as nonsensical as to say a president is immune to prosecution while conducting presidential business.The Supreme Court is requiring an appeals court to review a ruling on a case with the same charge Hunter was charged with.
This is kind of hard to follow, but what I'm getting out of the story is that if the appeals court decides it's not legal to restrict gun ownership if someone has a drug problem, then it could also affect Hunter's conviction.
MOO
What am I missing?
![]()
Supreme Court orders another review of gun charge behind Hunter Biden's conviction
The Supreme Court told another defendant convicted of the same gun charge as Hunter Biden to have his conviction reviewed again at the appeals court.www.usatoday.com
All my opinions.
Where are my rights as a law abiding citizen for the pursuit of happiness while drug crazed people, or mentally unstable people play shoot em up because they claim to fear for their life? What about my rights to my body? What about the rights to children to go to school to learn and not be sitting ducks for some person to hunt them down with an assault rifle that can legally be modified into an automatic weapon?
Common sense people!
Just had to get that off my chest. I'm sure I have lots of company.