Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #188

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
It was a crappy thing what CW and company did.

I would NOT be clapping that future jurors would see it.

IMO, CW has her own issues and yes, it would have been cool to have CW and company on the podcast but they declined to answer them so that's on CM & company as that was their choice. JMO

I was talking about Bob Motta's invitation to Aine and Kevin. He gave them more than 24 hours notice and they ignored him. Not surprising.

IMO MOO
 
I was talking about Bob Motta's invitation to Aine and Kevin. He gave them more than 24 hours notice and they ignored him. Not surprising.

IMO MOO
Oh, well in the post from you that I quoted, Mottas name was not there and sounded like you were discussing the other clowns .

sorry for the confusion.
 
I was talking about Bob Motta's invitation to Aine and Kevin. He gave them more than 24 hours notice and they ignored him. Not surprising.

IMO MOO
Not at all surprising to me that they didn't want to attend a podcast hosted by the very people they find reprehensible in their words and actions. What was surprising to me was that CW didn't chose to attend. Just my thoughts
 
Beautiful public post from Becky Patty.



BP is classy and full of grace.
I wish that everyone would take just a moment and think about what it must be like to stand in her shoes!
 
Not at all surprising to me that they didn't want to attend a podcast hosted by the very people they find reprehensible in their words and actions. What was surprising to me was that CW didn't chose to attend. Just my thoughts
IMO MOO ETC

Not to mention Motta was a named, active contributor in the messages and said that Murder Sheet is in his “Zone of Pain.”

Whatever that means.

Reference:

I’ll report and ask whether Defense Diaries is an allowed source here since posters are referencing as though it were despite the principals’ demonstrated hypocrisy and lack of credibility.

IMO MOO ETC
 
Not at all surprising to me that they didn't want to attend a podcast hosted by the very people they find reprehensible in their words and actions. What was surprising to me was that CW didn't chose to attend. Just my thoughts

I agree....I wish she had.
 
I’ll report and ask whether Defense Diaries is an allowed source here since posters are referencing as though it were despite the principals’ demonstrated hypocrisy and lack of credibility.

IMO MOO ETC

Thank you!

Since they are being disparaged by the Murder Sheet, an approved source, it seems only fair that we can at least mention their names and discuss them. It would be hard to talk about the Murder Sheets complaints without saying their names.

IMO MOO
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BP is classy and full of grace.
I wish that everyone would take just a moment and think about what it must be like to stand in her shoes!

She's always so on top of things. Doesn't miss a thing. Libby looks so adorable in that pic of her frowning. What a cute baby she was and beautiful girl.

IMO MOO
 
She's always so on top of things. Doesn't miss a thing. Libby looks so adorable in that pic of her frowning. What a cute baby she was and beautiful girl.

IMO MOO


LG has a radiance in her smile that most people can only wish to have.
She was SO full of life!

How sad that it was stolen!
 
Thank you!

Since they are being disparaged by the Murder Sheets, an approved source, it seems only fair that we can at least mention their names and discuss them. It would be hard to talk about the Murder Sheets complaints without saying their names.

IMO MOO
IMO MOO

There’s a difference between saying their names and citing unlinked YouTube content.

I’d like to clarify a one-time use allowance for whatever episode you keep referring to. Certainly, though, one is not compelled to listen to it before critiquing it.

I’m certain he followed my predicted playbook:

1) Normalize
2) Minimize
3) Cheer on the amazing professionalism of his sorry band of unethical morons

Did he deny it? My guess is no, he can’t deny it because there are receipts. So instead they’ll spin it using a playbook older than dirt — something an old warhorse might remember.

IMO MOO ETC
 
Is there a standardized license required to do this sort of work? I can't seem to find info that says X is required, and X is the oversight body??
I don't know if Indiana has a legal requirement or not. But it seems like common sense is required.

B and R have already had bad outcomes with leaks coming from their organisation. I'd think they'd want to lock down those kinds of situations in the future. Having 4 of their closest inner circle hanging out in a Discord group chat, discussing the case strategy and 'making' future plan ideas to take to the defense team seems risky and problematic.

Just the fact that there are defense team members, like CW, openly discussing the release of the jurors info, to anyone who volunteers, is a bad look. It is unprofessional, if not technically illegal. IMO
 
Why should we take HIS word for it? Why can't we see it for ourselves? In entirity?
So now you want them to release all the screenshotted messages publicly? Do you think CW really wants that?

I suppose they will if CW and MH etc, call for that. But I doubt they will.

But if they keep accusing MS of being misleading they might release all of the messages. That is probably not in CW's best interest. IMO
 
I really wish the MS youtubers would just go on a live with the people they are accusing (who have offered to talk like adults about it) and get it all out in the open.
MS already offered to talk about it all together like adults and CW and the others refused the invitation.
And I think we ALL would be embarrassed to have our private conversations made public the way youtubers Aine and Kevin did to CW so I really do not blame her for being mad.
It depends upon what the conversations were about. If I said that seeing pictures of the victims all smiling and happy really bothered me and made me sick, and that seeing the grisly crime photos was not really as bad as I thought--I might be embarrassed.
It was a crappy thing to do and not at all professional.
I think Paul was doing the right thing.
They got a headline out of it though, so mission accomplished. Future juors may see it and be influenced. Clap clap clap.

IMO MOO
I don't think it was all about headlines. IMO
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
2,198
Total visitors
2,332

Forum statistics

Threads
600,333
Messages
18,106,875
Members
230,992
Latest member
Clue Keeper
Back
Top