Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #188

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
TTF14 said:
She's in Delphi a full ten days before the hearings? Hmmm....wonder if she has some kind of inside scoop that something's gonna happen.

IMO MOO
Click to expand...

:oops: Perhaps she does. This BS going on with loose lips and MS just proves one thing....peoples words are NEVER entirely private in any group chats or PM's - DM's. All it takes is one "innie" to let er' rip and me/you/everyone sees what we thought was private. Know and trust who you share things with. I know it's how I choose to do it. :)

That's why
 
Caylee Advocate said:
:oops: Perhaps she does. This BS going on with loose lips and MS just proves one thing....peoples words are NEVER entirely private in any group chats or PM's - DM's. All it takes is one "innie" to let er' rip and me/you/everyone sees what we thought was private. Know and trust who you share things with. I know it's how I choose to do it. :)

That's why
Click to expand...

For sure. I never say anything in private messages that I'm not ok with being shared with others. Gotta be strategic!

IMO MOO
 
TTF14 said:
She's in Delphi a full ten days before the hearings? Hmmm....wonder if she has some kind of inside scoop that something's gonna happen.

IMO MOO
Click to expand...

Where does she state she is currently in Delphi? I went to her X and don't see it but I am good at missing things!
 
TTF14 said:
Oh....you're right! I hate Twitter!! I read this as two separate Tweets! "In Delphi for a motions hearing"....like she was saying "I'm in Delphi...."

Sorry for the confusion!!
Click to expand...

You're fine, I was just wondering because husband and I are going on a motorcycle ride to the bridge tomorrow and thought I might run into her!
 
twall said:
You're fine, I was just wondering because husband and I are going on a motorcycle ride to the bridge tomorrow and thought I might run into her!
Click to expand...

If you wait a week, you might! :)

I was confused as it's not like Delphi is a hot spot to schedule a week-long vacation around a work trip!

Enjoy your ride!
 
susane7 said:
It's my interpretration from their filings, behavior and constant delayings tactis. They were still looking for a witness for runes less than a moth before the trial. That's one thing that I and BM fully agreed.
Click to expand...

BM? Barb MacDonald?
 
photographer4 said:
IMO, there may already be quite a lot of evidence that may provide for a reasonable doubt. I’m hoping that the state has a super strong airtight case, and they can get their conviction if in fact, he is guilty. Of course I don’t want him to walk or have this drag on further but if their case isn’t easy to follow and very strong, he may not be convicted.
Click to expand...
My opinion is that they do not have the evidence that can prove without a reasonable doubt that Richard Allen is solely responsible for this heinous crime. If they did, this case would have been solved a long time ago.
I do hope I’m wrong for the sake of Abbie and Libby, their family and friends. Let’s hope and pray that the right person, or persons are held accountable.
 
photographer4 said:
I’m not calling her lazy - the Supreme Court and the defense did. What probably would have been wiser for her would have been to rule on things within the timeline she is supposed to. Preferably with the benefit of a written decision that show how she arrived at her decision vs just a granted or denied. Or ya know… no response whatsoever.
Click to expand...
They did not… they never ruled on the merits of any of it because it was irrelevant. The motion wasn’t valid to begin with. The verbiage of the rule is that the judge “may” be removed, and there are many exceptions to the rule. All the court did was point out that instead of continuing to file motions, they should have filed for relief the first time a deadline was missed. Or the second. Or the third. Then the court would have actually ruled if there was a violation of trial rules and/or RA’s rights.

IOW, stating the defense should have filed at a different point to make the motion valid is not the same as saying the defense would have won the motion. It wasn’t even considered.

JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 71 more.
Total: 502 (members: 72, guests: 430)

Online statistics

Members online
72
Guests online
430
Total visitors
502
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,347
Messages
18,238,018
Members
234,348
Latest member
Allira93
Back
Top