PA - Assassination attempt, shooting injures former POTUS Donald Trump, leaves 1 spectator deceased two in critical condition, 13 July 2024 #4

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I understand having things they can't/don't share with local LE, but if the SS is relying on local LE to help and if they have delegated significant security tasks to them, then it's negligent to not have a way for them to communicate with one another. I'm not saying they have to share secret routes or info that only SS needs to know, but how the heck are they going to learn of a threat if local LE are in charge of watching for these threats and then they can't in turn communicate that to the SS?
They do have a way to communicate with local LE and vice versa.

It works all the time, during hundreds, if not thousands of events every year, for decades.
 
At that hearing, Cheatle refused to resign, saying she was the best qualified person to head the Secret Service, which is responsible for protecting the president, vice president, their family members, and leading presidential candidates.

But on Tuesday, Cheatle in a letter wrote to Secret Service staff, "In light of recent events, it is with a heavy heart that, I have made the difficult decision to step down as your Director."

 
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/23/politics/secret-service-director-kimberly-cheatle/index.html

US Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle has tendered her resignation amid scrutiny of security lapses related to the recent assassination attempt of former President Donald Trump, sources tell CNN.

The move comes as lawmakers and an internal government watchdog move forward with investigations into the agency’s handling of Trump’s protection and how a gunman came close to the killing the 2024 Republican presidential candidate at a rally in Pennsylvania this month.

There have been bipartisan calls in Congress for her resignation and a push by Republican lawmakers to impeach her. Lawmakers were particularly incensed after her appearance for public testimony in front of the House Oversight Commitee Monday, where she was unwilling to answer many of the committee’s questions.
 
Just curious, have any other heads of SS resigned after assassinations or attempted assassinations?

I don't believe so. After JFK's assassination, neither the director nor any of the agents were fired or asked to resign.

 
Last edited:
I will not be surprised to find others may lose their jobs when this investigation is complete. While Cheatle was ultimately in charge, there were likely other failures. I hope it's not just "forgotten" now that she has resigned, meaning people will be appeased that the 'seemingly known problem' is now gone. Policies and communication need to be looked at after this tragic event.
Given the known threats and details that have emerged, there should have been a bare minimum of a perimeter and security presence of AT LEAST the known distance a typical rifle could shoot. That seems to be common sense, imo.

Also, IF Cheatle is ultimately responsible, I don't think she should be allowed to resign and keep her pension, etc. She should be fired. There is a big difference between resigning and being fired.
 
That took too long. If she was just going to quit, why even bother to go through the tongue lashing she got yesterday?
Because she seriously wanted to help the fact finding and is not a coward?

There is a difference between quitting and resigning.

People quit when they don't have the character to take responsibility. They resign after reflection when they do take responsibility.

MOO
 
We don't know if she was informed if she didn't resign she would be fired.
IIRC: There are financial benefits to resigning which is why many in LE like police officers who are caught up in most likely forthcoming criminal charges against them quickly resign knowing they will be fired.
It could apply to federal jobs too even if possible criminal charges aren't involved.

Then again even she knew she lost all credibility after yesterday's hearing.
 
Local police alerted the Secret Service before former president Donald Trump’s rally Saturday that they lacked the resources to station a patrol car outside a key building where a gunman later positioned himself and shot at Trump, according to local and federal law enforcement.

Richard Goldinger, the district attorney in Butler County, Pa., where the Trump rally took place, said the Secret Service “was informed that the local police department did not have manpower to assist with securing that building.”

 
We don't know if she was informed if she didn't resign she would be fired.
IIRC: There are financial benefits to resigning which is why many in LE like police officers who are caught up in most likely forthcoming criminal charges against them quickly resign knowing they will be fired.
It could apply to federal jobs too even if possible criminal charges aren't involved.

Then again even she knew she lost all credibility after yesterday's hearing.
I wondered if this was the case. Biden is said to be returning to Washington today. Maybe he gave her the opportunity to resign so he didn't have to fire her. JMO
 
'President Joe Biden, in a statement, thanked Cheatle for “her decades of public service,” and said, “As a leader, it takes honor, courage, and incredible integrity to take full responsibility for an organization tasked with one of the most challenging jobs in public service.”

Biden also said he plans to appoint a new Secret Service director “soon,”


 
Many employees incorrectly believe that they will lose their federal retirement benefits if the agency fires them.

However, the truth is that federal employees whose retirement benefits have vested are all but guaranteed to receive those benefits, subject to a few exceptions.

Employees unaware of this may be tempted or pressured to resign if they know they are about to be fired.

 
If the Secret Service wasn't tracking this information to know when and if things were done, that's even more of a failure of the Secret Service. The Secret Service should have had that information in near real time if the Secret Service was doing their jobs whether it was Secret Service, Homeland Security or local LE who was asked to do it. It would be absolutely horrible if the Secret Service was supposed to protect against an Iranian retaliatory assassination of a former President and didn't even bother to keep a log of all security sweeps or verify that were done nor check if a roof within 200 yards of the former President was actually secured and stayed secured...what you are describing would be complete dereliction of duty by the Secret Service if this is true that the Secret Service didn't even bother to keep so much as logs of this information.
Ita.

IF there are any logs kept, will they be revealed, though ?
Omo.
 
Just curious, have any other heads of SS resigned after assassinations or attempted assassinations?

I don't believe so. After JFK's assassination, neither the director nor any of the agents were fired or asked to resign.



I will go through Zero Fail- I think I have it on my bookshelf. I can't say I memorized it, but I don't recall any resignations after Reagan was shot, etc.

On one hand, I haven't seen anything that leads me to believe that she was the problem. I would like to know much more about budget, mission creep, and possible unintended poor outcomes having SS being part of Homeland Security. So if this is the end, I feel very much like this has ended prematurely.

The FBI, I imagine, is not likely to investigate the SS. They are prosecuting the crime(s) committed a week and a half ago. So, it does not comfort me that the FBI is investigating; it's entirely unrelated to security failures. It's like, if my local police were investigating a break in to my house, they'd collect clues about who the perp is, but wouldn't figure out why it was possible to kick my door in, or why my alarm company didn't respond fast enough. It's a separate concern.

On the other hand- one of the expectations of an appointed department head is that they resign or accept being asked to leave when necessary for the department. So far, her decisions have appeared very good up to now, so I'm confident her resignation at this time was a good decision.

MOO
 
Just curious, have any other heads of SS resigned after assassinations or attempted assassinations?

I don't believe so. After JFK's assassination, neither the director nor any of the agents were fired or asked to resign.

I think the difference is this time there were clearly unacceptable mistakes made that almost killed the president and cost an innocent man his life. It’s never as simple as blaming one person and calling for their resignation, but when you take on the leadership of an agency like SS, you accept responsibility for the actions of everyone under you. It’s just the way it is. It’s almost never fair, but you know going in when you agree to be the head/face of a huge organization that you become liable for things that happen on your watch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
153
Guests online
2,508
Total visitors
2,661

Forum statistics

Threads
600,481
Messages
18,109,261
Members
230,991
Latest member
Clue Keeper
Back
Top