But it isn't just any old adverse ruling, is it.There’s a danger especially IMO in being so invested in the bigger case - that just normal old criminal litigation gets over interpreted.
The prosecution appeal was a long shot. but probably the only argument they had. no doubt there is bad feeling. not uncommon!
What i am saying is similar things happen every month in cases across the land but we are all hanging on it.
Judges make rulings in cases. One party or other feels it’s biased. but getting Judges removed for actual bias is highly unlikely based only on an adverse ruling. MOO
The procedures taken against CB were instituted in 2022 when he was charged with five separate and unrelated sexual offences spanning the years and against females of all ages from infants to geriatrics.
CB began committing known and convicted for sexual offences against women and children at a very young age himself while resident in Germany.
He led a peripatetic lifestyle which makes for a very difficult felon to catch. Through the years based in Portugal he maintained his interest in *advertiser censored* and was convicted in 2019 of an aggravated rape committed there in 2024. His return to Germany resulted in a further sexual conviction for offences against a six year old child.
Having been charged on five counts what did the Braunschweig judges do?
It appears they spent a considerable amount of time succumbing to consideration of defence led motions fighting another case entirely. What on earth were they thinking of when allowing their court to consider cases other than the five they should have been concentrating on.
Something went seriously wrong in the Braunschweig court and it is going to take a lot of sorting out because the judicial prejudice displayed throughout these five hearings is massive.
Imagine it! three cases with victim and witness testimony and the judges didn't pick up on a word of it all. Really not good enough
My opinion