Officer Dibble
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2017
- Messages
- 3,643
- Reaction score
- 15,306
What were all these people doing outside so early to commit a crime? Doesn't make sense to me.
It's odd that her jacket is missing. That would be a bright colour with a high chance of attracting attention, if her attacker took it. I wonder if she removed it herself after a long walk and becoming warm after a few miles, perhaps tying it around her waist. But that still doesn't answer why it is missing, unless it was taken because it had DNA on it. That would suggest a criminal mindset, hypothetically.
Interesting that it is stated he is from Brantham but has been instructed not to enter there. It sounds as if he does not have a permanent home there.[...]
On Wednesday, July 31, a week after the initial investigation was launched, a man aged his 20s was arrested on suspicion of murder.
The man, who is also from Brantham, was taken to Martlesham police station and police were granted extra hours for questioning.
He has since been released on bail until Thursday, October 24, with conditions including not to enter Brantham and Manningtree.
[...]
Brantham murder suspect released on bail
I wonder if they could be seasonal workers employed to work on farms.What were all these people doing outside so early to commit a crime? Doesn't make sense to me.
I am not sure if train cctv would capture that much outside of the carriage.In addition to the appeal to train passengers, I think most trains have CCTV on them now don't they? Just thinking about the bus CCTV footage that was so useful in helping to nail Couzens.
I am not sure if train cctv would capture that much outside of the carriage.
It seems risky to attack a woman walking a dog. An assailant risks the dog attacking the assailant, in protecting its human. Maybe she walks her dog off-leash and her dog was not within sight when attacked?
Do they know for sure Anita didn’t just fall and hit her head on the tracks on her own? Why is determining cause of death not determinable at this point?
I imagine that there was enough evidence to say she was murdered.It seems risky to attack a woman walking a dog. An assailant risks the dog attacking the assailant, in protecting its human. Maybe she walks her dog off-leash and her dog was not within sight when attacked?
Do they know for sure Anita didn’t just fall and hit her head on the tracks on her own? Why is determining cause of death not determinable at this point?
Oh my, I just realized I misunderstood something. I thought I saw she was found on the “track”, so my mind went to train tracks, since there are train tracks in the area.
I’ve reread some articles and they say “on a track near a railway line”, or “track road close to a railway”, “track off Rectory Lane”.
Now, I believe I understand it to mean she was found on what I might call a trail, which happens to be near the train tracks.
(I’m in the US, so please excuse my perhaps American English confusion.)