I’ve asked this many times. Tennis never gets mentioned—why?
My hunch is that the clothing the killer wore was easily stereotyped as ‘skater’ and tunnel vision occurred.
I can't figure out if it's because they don't believe the possibility, or don't WANT to believe it.
Ultimately, I think the thing that makes the most sense is politics. T
Agreed re: politics. Particularly in the 90s, tensions were high between Japanese citizens and military bases, primarily because of crimes committed by Americans (still true today).
I agree that the US would be unlikely to turn over a teenager/military dependent to a foreign government, especially with the death penalty on the table. But also, politics; admitting a dependent committed 4 brutal murders would be absolutely incendiary.
Legally, a US military base overseas is considered American soil. So if a kid shoplifts at the BX, the MPs have authority to arrest them or whatever.
If the kid shoplifts in Tokyo, and is caught, he can be arrested by the local police. However, if he runs back to base, the local police do not have authority/jurisdiction to come on base and arrest them. That’s where things get sticky.
As a possible point of interest, military members overseas are technically bound to 3 different legal systems:
- American laws based on the Constitution
- the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) - military rules and regulations members are bound by and
- the laws of the host country when off-base.
In general, if you, a US service member, commit a crime in a foreign country, any punishment is likely to be administered via court martial (UCMJ), rather than by the host nation’s judiciary.
All that said - I don’t know how that plays out for dependents.