<rsbm>
I think you know this Arkay, just wanting to point out for others who think that circumstantial evidence is not as critical as direct.
Most convictions are based on heavy circumstantial evidence.
The Difference between circumstantial evidence and direct evidence is that circumstantial is evidence is open to reasonable interpretation by a reasonable person reviewing it (i.e. even autopsy results are circumstantial because they are open to interpretation, whether by the medical examiner, LE, or the public). Direct evidence on the other hand does not require interpretation (eye witness accounts, surveillance video of the murder).