There is no audio.This is not clear to me here.
I was under the impression there were no cameras in the Judge's chambers.
Can't find it now but I remember reading that the reason the Judge's chambers were used for the former deputy's sexual favors was precisely because there were no cameras. Guess I'm wrong.There is no audio.
I just hope that whatever evidence there was was real and not some edited phony photoshop inflammatory thing.... LE is too smart to believe anything doctored, right?<Snipped for focus>
The motive will 100% be deeply personal.
My guess is, the judge did something unforgivable in the shooter's mind, and eliminating him was the only proper justice.
jmo
That would have beenCan't find it now but I remember reading that the reason the Judge's chambers were used for the former deputy's sexual favors was precisely because there were no cameras. Guess I'm wrong.
Chambers generally have an anteroom, sort of like a reception area where the secretary sits and through which one goes to access chambers, which is a private room separated by a door that is behind the anteroom. There may well be cameras within the anteroom, but ime, judges do not have cameras within chambers proper. Hth.This is not clear to me here.
I was under the impression there were no cameras in the Judge's chambers.
No, you are remembering correctly. This was for that prior lawsuit case in, was it—2022?Can't find it now but I remember reading that the reason the Judge's chambers were used for the former deputy's sexual favors was precisely because there were no cameras. Guess I'm wrong.
The civil lawsuit was filed early 2022 -- I believe the inappropriate actions by the former deputy occurred in 2021 when there were reportedly no cameras in the Judges Chambers. I think the deputy's conduct probably prompted the addition of a camera. JMOof interest to me is the information that there were video cameras in the judge's chambers. I wonder when those cameras were installed? Were those cameras present when the former deputy who is facing the civil suit for impropriety was allegedly in that same office engaging in sex with the petitioner? Or were they added later, after that allegation came out?
my understanding is the SA took place in the judge's chambers in and after June of 2021. The lawsuit was filed in 2022, so not four years. I found this in reference to cameras but can't find anything thus far to substantiate if what Fields told his victim was accurate.That would have been four years ago and I would not be surprised if cameras were added because of the problem caused by the former deputy. It was a recent report that indicated there is no audio but video of Stiles and Mullins exchanging their phones with each other. JMO
My understanding is that visual without audio was present IN Mullins inner chambers. the video of the day of the shooting shows Stines and the Judge in his chambers, Stine closes the door to the chambers and the men are seen swapping and looking at one another's phones, then Stines shot the judge multiple times.Chambers generally have an anteroom, sort of like a reception area where the secretary sits and through which one goes to access chambers, which is a private room separated by a door that is behind the anteroom. There may well be cameras within the anteroom, but ime, judges do not have cameras within chambers proper. Hth.
^^rsbmI don't understand what the two could have been trading phones to look at just prior to the argument and shooting?
Thank you. I’d envisioned the phone exchange occurring in the reception area, then the parties entering into chambers, with the closing of the door, then the shooting. So the shooting itself is on video. Wow. Thanks for the clarification!My understanding is that visual without audio was present IN Mullins inner chambers. the video of the day of the shooting shows Stines and the Judge in his chambers, Stine closes the door to the chambers and the men are seen swapping and looking at one another's phones, then Stines shot the judge multiple times.