That is the only question, or the first question, the state's attorney should ask him, along with, can you say with certainty that the bullets that killed Mo Wilson did not come from Kaitlin Armstrong's gun? NO? No further questions.
I don't know how much he may have been paid, but I don't think it was enough to overcome the mountain of evidence that points directly to the defendant.
So if there is no scientific accepted protocol, he can only offer an opinion, and we all have one of those. He just seems to think his is superior to anyone else's.
This seems, to me, like it may be the defense's star witness. His soul job seems to be to cast doubt on the ballistics findings, or confuse the jurors, and he has seemingly impressive credentials, though he does come off as arrogant, so not sure the jury will find him likeable. Do we think the...
Everything that possibly could have gone wrong, in order to implicate an innocent KA, would had to have gone wrong, in order for her not to be guilty of this murder. Someone had to have gotten her Jeep and driven the murder area while her phone was in the Jeep, although we have seen texts from...
I think she believes that she will get away with the murder. There is no other logical reason why she would have turned down the plea deal that was offered.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.