Search results

Question...What if? So, CG reports in tomorrow that overnight he exchanged the $100k for Sherri and she is home, safe and sound. States he has no idea who the individual was that he made the exchange with, and doesn't care because mission was accomplished. She's home, no interviews, no press...

Sherri was last seen jogging in her neighborhood on the morning of Wednesday, November 2. Family members sounded the alarm later that day. Keith Papini, Sherri's husband, tracked her cell phone using the Find My iPhone application. Sherri's ear buds were still in the phone, with strands...

I believe that was the date that the wedding photographer posted the blog on the wedding http://www.brettandemilyphoto.com/2009/11/17/keith-and-sherri-we-heart-you-san-diego-wedding-photographer/

Watched the video and all I could envision was standing in a K-Mart and staring at a flashing blue light while "Attention shoppers" blared in the background.

I would think the type of footwear (if any) missing from the residence might shed some light on what she was doing and/or where she was went she disappeared.

I can't believe that PD's don't keep a 24/7 record of their dispatch recordings. Also that they wouldn't know where, through GPS, any of their cruisers are at any given point in time. I'd think they would require this, if for nothing else the safety of their officers. If so, why couldn't they...

Who was the lowlife Manitowoc cop that said something to the effect of... "Why would we go to all the trouble to frame Steven Avery, when we could just kill him"? I don't think it's a stretch for any jury member to fear that could apply to any resident of the area, including themself.

A volunteer for the Manitowoc sheriffs, the same department Avery was suing for wrongful imprisonment, was one of the jurors that put the convicted killer behind bars. He was selected as a juror, even after he revealed his son, Chris Wardman, was a sergeant within the Manitowoc County...

This, this, this and this.

Of the following four possibilities..... a) the ex-boyfriend murdered TH b) Lenk murdered TH c) the cop that read the license plate murdered TH d) SA raped PB ...I'd say (d) is the least likely.

"We didn't expect to find any DNA or blood evidence in the trailer" Really Ken? I guess we can add psychic alongside sexual predator to your list of occupations.

Agreed. I can't imagine the number of prisons we'd have build to house everyone who "could be guilty" Heck, we could have a free for all and and convict four, five, six different people of interest for a single crime.

I've never quite understood the mentality/thought process of many, many LE investigators. Why wouldn't you want something--anything--that can be substantiated as fact allowed into an investigation? Isn't the whole point to find the actual person, not just any person, who could have committed...

Glad to hear SA and BD are receiving lots of cards, letters and well-wishes from the general public. Anything to help keep their spirits up as they (hopefully) await a new trial.

Kratz doesn't kill women, he violates them.

1.Guilty (beyond a reasonable doubt) 2.Guilty (Not Proven) 3.Not Guilty (reasonable doubt) 4.Innocent (Beyond a reasonable doubt) It would seem the general consensus of this thread lies somewhere between 2 & 3 (but closer to 3) The original thread consensus looks to be between 1 & 2 (and...

And this, in a nutshell, is what everyone should fear/be aware of, if or when they are charged with any crime.

Sounds like the state of Wisconsin is full of incompetent people in positions of power/authority. Would he fit more in the crooked and deceitful group with Wiegert and Assbender, Kratz, Kachinsky and O'Kelly? ...or in the "I'm just plain dumb and don't recall when,how and why I even got this...