Search results for query: *

Who was the heavy set female speaking for the O'Keefe family? She tried, but failed to, suppress her bitterness

DBM {mod edit}

Justice served for the defendant. Now, for me, back to more important things. Got some horse racing to watch

Didn't this happened a few popes ago? The voting crew switched from black smoke to white smoke and were ready to announce when the smoke turned black again. I think one of the Cardinals in the voting room accidently emptied his pipe tobacco on the fire and turned the smoke black again by accident.

Apparently the tuna sandwiches for lunch were below par, so some jurors changed their collective minds and decided on a better lunch on Friday.

My point exactly. Agree 100%. Well said.

I can see a guilty on the OUI. Having said that, it would be an absolute injustice if she were given the maximum sentence for that. A small fine maybe, as a first time offender. That, along with any hardship she has incurred due to the trials, is more than enough of a penalty.

--Her desire to be front and centre of most everything. --Her inappropriate back and forth texts with the creepy cop while she was currently in a relationship with the victim. --At every side bar, her apparent need to not act like 99.9% of all defendants and just stay at the defense table and...

Despising the defendant (as I do) and believing she's not guilty (as I do) are not mutually exclusive.

Acting like a bunch of posers. Kinda sad considering what's at stake. No matter the verdict, my biggest wish is the defendant disappears from the limelight never to be heard of again.

The satisfaction of sending someone to prison just because she thinks they are guilty? She clearly has something to gain in her own mind. Wonder if she or her husband are gamblers and placed a big wager on a guilty verdict on murder?

I love how Jackson keeps calling the victim by his first name (John). He absolutely comes across as sympathetic towards JOK. Unlike many trials, where defense lawyers turn to victim blaming or shaming.

Jackson is so good at his job that I'm willing to bet that if we began this case from scratch with him as the prosecutor (and Brennan as the defense attorney) that there's a really good chance a jury would find the defendant guilty.

I'm sure there has been worse but I've never seen a high profile case prosecuted so badly. The CW only has themselves to blame in having Brennan try this. Well that, plus the excellent job by the defense (mainly Jackson) I don't see it taking longer than an hour or two for the jury to find the...

The place he should be at when he answers the defense (or anyone's) questions as a witness. To wit, with straight forward, to the point answers. As opposed to him answering the CW questions with the same disdain that Yuri showed the defense on cross.

I don't like this prosecutor either but... "Sir, Do you have a theory about someone planting evidence in this case?" ..was great!!!!!!!! Sure put the witness in his place.

Isn't Brennan prosecuting this case? Was there a witness named Brennan? I was posting about witnesses and how they come across on the stand. ::confused::

AJ being very smart now by cutting off the witness' answers short. Before he gets a chance to add-on or embellish which the jury might not appreciate. Great work by the defense attorney

I'm curious, if you were a juror, how you would react to the witness taking the time to wave to and wish his son a "Happy Birthday" while on the stand of a murder trial. 1) Commend him for being a great father? 2) Be disgusted by the fact he's doing so in the middle of a murder trial where the...

Rentschler. Not a likeable witness.......if I was on the jury. Won't just answer the question but feels he needs to "add-on" to every answer. Can't blame the CW for the multiple objections and I agree with the Judge on sustaining most of them.